Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which parts of D&D came from Tolkien?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 7264964" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>About the principle I described? I suggest you do some reading.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, because this is an obvious straw man argument that at best just shows you don't understand what you are responding to. </p><p></p><p>We can obviously have vampire books and movies without it being pulled from Anne Rice, because obviously vampires preexist Anne Rice. But, if we observe fiction which contains elements about vampires that did not exist before Anne Rice wrote her stories, then we can conclude that that fiction descends not from vampire fiction generally but from Anne Rice specifically. So, yes, we can tell whether or not a piece of fiction was influenced by and owes its existence in part to Anne Rice's highly influential works. And likewise, we can tell whether the piece of vampire fiction is influenced by other highly influential works. For example, if we see a close association between bats and vampires, then we can be almost sure that the fiction was influenced by Bram Stoker's Dracula, because Bram Stoker mistranslated the word for 'moth' as 'bat' when researching his story. You might object that the writer was influenced to associate bats and vampires by tales of the vampire bat, but then you'd have to note that the 'vampire bat' was not even called the vampire bat until 1901 - four years after the publication of Dracula - even though it had been known to science for almost 100 years before that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, your post is speculation. I have textual evidence. You have offered none. Moreover, you are citing the existence of a tale of the Arabian Nights that so far as I can tell does not exist. The Rocs of the Arabian Nights do not offer benevolent aid in stories that I'm familiar with, but rather carry off sailors inadvertently when the sailors strap themselves to carcasses. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First, #2 is clearly bogus. There are almost no elements common between say the 5th voyage of Sinbad and Tolkien's giant eagles, other than that both are large birds. But more to the point, neither of your speculations are what is at stake.</p><p></p><p>What you have to show is that the Monster Manual would end up with BOTH an entry for Roc and an entry for Giant Eagle without the influence of Tolkien, and that the entry for Giant Eagle - whatever it's source material - would have been familiar to the writer of the Monster Manual and suggested to them 'Chaotic Good' as an alignment. All I have to show is that the Roc entry clearly conforms to the description of the Roc of Arabian story and so is almost certainly derived from the Arabian stories, and that the Giant Eagle clearly conforms to the description of the Giant Eagles of Tolkien's stories and so is almost certainly derived from the Tolkien stories.</p><p></p><p>The existence of the two entries speaks for itself, and to my mind settles the question all by itself. No reader of the Arabian Nights alone would be likely to independently imagine two different types of 'Roc', name one of them independently 'Giant Eagle', and also independently imagine them as just large enough to bear a rider but not an elephant and as being generally benevolent. Nor is it reasonable to suppose that this hypothetical inventor in the 1970's is familiar with the Arabian Nights tale but not with Tolkien and is not influenced by Tolkien in his creation of the 'Giant Eagles'. </p><p></p><p>And further, until you actually show me this hypothetical story of rocs rescuing sailors on purpose because they are benevolent (and not trying to eat a sheep or cow carcass that the sailor has tied themselves to), your theory that Tolkien is influenced by the bestial Roc of Arabic lore and not by more proximal Eurpean ideas like Zeus's noble companion/sevant the Aetos Dios has more holes in it than Swiss cheese. Recall if you will that unlike the Roc, the Giant Eagles of Tolkien are the servants of Manwe the 'god' of the sky, and king of the 'gods' in Tolkien's legerdemain. These are features that the Roc does not have, but are clearly the features that inspire Tolkien's eagles as literal Deus ex Machina.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 7264964, member: 4937"] About the principle I described? I suggest you do some reading. Yes, because this is an obvious straw man argument that at best just shows you don't understand what you are responding to. We can obviously have vampire books and movies without it being pulled from Anne Rice, because obviously vampires preexist Anne Rice. But, if we observe fiction which contains elements about vampires that did not exist before Anne Rice wrote her stories, then we can conclude that that fiction descends not from vampire fiction generally but from Anne Rice specifically. So, yes, we can tell whether or not a piece of fiction was influenced by and owes its existence in part to Anne Rice's highly influential works. And likewise, we can tell whether the piece of vampire fiction is influenced by other highly influential works. For example, if we see a close association between bats and vampires, then we can be almost sure that the fiction was influenced by Bram Stoker's Dracula, because Bram Stoker mistranslated the word for 'moth' as 'bat' when researching his story. You might object that the writer was influenced to associate bats and vampires by tales of the vampire bat, but then you'd have to note that the 'vampire bat' was not even called the vampire bat until 1901 - four years after the publication of Dracula - even though it had been known to science for almost 100 years before that. No, your post is speculation. I have textual evidence. You have offered none. Moreover, you are citing the existence of a tale of the Arabian Nights that so far as I can tell does not exist. The Rocs of the Arabian Nights do not offer benevolent aid in stories that I'm familiar with, but rather carry off sailors inadvertently when the sailors strap themselves to carcasses. First, #2 is clearly bogus. There are almost no elements common between say the 5th voyage of Sinbad and Tolkien's giant eagles, other than that both are large birds. But more to the point, neither of your speculations are what is at stake. What you have to show is that the Monster Manual would end up with BOTH an entry for Roc and an entry for Giant Eagle without the influence of Tolkien, and that the entry for Giant Eagle - whatever it's source material - would have been familiar to the writer of the Monster Manual and suggested to them 'Chaotic Good' as an alignment. All I have to show is that the Roc entry clearly conforms to the description of the Roc of Arabian story and so is almost certainly derived from the Arabian stories, and that the Giant Eagle clearly conforms to the description of the Giant Eagles of Tolkien's stories and so is almost certainly derived from the Tolkien stories. The existence of the two entries speaks for itself, and to my mind settles the question all by itself. No reader of the Arabian Nights alone would be likely to independently imagine two different types of 'Roc', name one of them independently 'Giant Eagle', and also independently imagine them as just large enough to bear a rider but not an elephant and as being generally benevolent. Nor is it reasonable to suppose that this hypothetical inventor in the 1970's is familiar with the Arabian Nights tale but not with Tolkien and is not influenced by Tolkien in his creation of the 'Giant Eagles'. And further, until you actually show me this hypothetical story of rocs rescuing sailors on purpose because they are benevolent (and not trying to eat a sheep or cow carcass that the sailor has tied themselves to), your theory that Tolkien is influenced by the bestial Roc of Arabic lore and not by more proximal Eurpean ideas like Zeus's noble companion/sevant the Aetos Dios has more holes in it than Swiss cheese. Recall if you will that unlike the Roc, the Giant Eagles of Tolkien are the servants of Manwe the 'god' of the sky, and king of the 'gods' in Tolkien's legerdemain. These are features that the Roc does not have, but are clearly the features that inspire Tolkien's eagles as literal Deus ex Machina. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which parts of D&D came from Tolkien?
Top