Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which Prc for the Paladin?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="green slime" data-source="post: 1160596" data-attributes="member: 1325"><p>Oh yes I've done all that already <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> I have a "little" document with around 80 pages+ describing the world to the players. The section on morality and changes to some spells is outlined in two or three pages.</p><p></p><p>Given that this alignment system has been prevalent in the DnD for nigh 20(+?) years, it is rather strange that not more exists for this kind of campaign. Especially considering that it would seem Moorcock's Elric at least to some degree inspired the inclusion of the Law-Chaos axis. Basic was just a rather simplistic Evil vs Good, which left little room for ambiguity (IMO).</p><p></p><p>The real question being, why isn't this done in the PHB/DMG? It is just a much a typical fantasy novel point of conflict as Evil vs Good. What is the name of the Bad dude in Wheel of Time? Lord of Chaos, IIRC. It would not have required too much more effort to actually include spells with [chaos] and [law] designators, or add them to present spells (which is what I have attempted to do). People would still have ignored these at their own behest as they do today with much of the [Evil]/[Good] descriptors. And then we whom wanted them would be pleased and satisfied customers. But it appears that I am alone, so perhaps that is the answer. </p><p></p><p>BTW, people still manage to argue over those "little" things anyway, just look at those alignment/paladin/orc-baby slaying threads. IMO, it is just because the alignment system is left very much undefined and open to individual interpretation. In a system that is supposed to be absolute, it provides remarkably few guidelines. I guess it is a good way to avoid controversy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="green slime, post: 1160596, member: 1325"] Oh yes I've done all that already :D I have a "little" document with around 80 pages+ describing the world to the players. The section on morality and changes to some spells is outlined in two or three pages. Given that this alignment system has been prevalent in the DnD for nigh 20(+?) years, it is rather strange that not more exists for this kind of campaign. Especially considering that it would seem Moorcock's Elric at least to some degree inspired the inclusion of the Law-Chaos axis. Basic was just a rather simplistic Evil vs Good, which left little room for ambiguity (IMO). The real question being, why isn't this done in the PHB/DMG? It is just a much a typical fantasy novel point of conflict as Evil vs Good. What is the name of the Bad dude in Wheel of Time? Lord of Chaos, IIRC. It would not have required too much more effort to actually include spells with [chaos] and [law] designators, or add them to present spells (which is what I have attempted to do). People would still have ignored these at their own behest as they do today with much of the [Evil]/[Good] descriptors. And then we whom wanted them would be pleased and satisfied customers. But it appears that I am alone, so perhaps that is the answer. BTW, people still manage to argue over those "little" things anyway, just look at those alignment/paladin/orc-baby slaying threads. IMO, it is just because the alignment system is left very much undefined and open to individual interpretation. In a system that is supposed to be absolute, it provides remarkably few guidelines. I guess it is a good way to avoid controversy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which Prc for the Paladin?
Top