Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ARandomGod" data-source="post: 2316446" data-attributes="member: 17296">Well, apparently I didn't miss anything, as everything else was just people arguing about the MT. OOoh it's overpowered. No, it' underpowered.No it's not.Yes it is.No it's not.You're just contradicting me.No I'm not. There, you just did it again.No I didn't.Heheh. Well. One thing I noticed is that the MT character forgot to take a cohort himself. It's pretty well known that the leadership feat is overpowered. Of course, the MT is running horribly low on feats due to his inherent two in one nature... but still. Generally speaking people whom I've seen not allow MT would also not allow the Leadership feat. With a similiar arguement. Leadership is two in one, just a different way. Personally I don't think that it's in too much doubt as to HOW the leadership feat is more overpowered than the MT, but that doesn't really matter.Face it, the DM poster said he didn't like it "because". Sure, his because is a because it's overpowered, but something he apparently let himself get tricked into, proof of it's 'overpoweredness', he's gone about the wrong way. His argurement for why it's overpowered, if you read it carefully, is that it has more options than one person should, and it takes more spotlite time than one person should. Now, the leadership obviously does this too! And really I don't think that the people who are saying MT is underpowered are debating the fact that the MT has a LOT of options. And since that was the guy's real beef, you're arguing over the same side. You BOTH (all) think the MT is overpowered in the same way he does. Although it's obvious that he's also failing to see your point (that the MT is a horriffically weak character), you're also failing to see his (that it's two in one! TWO IN ONE@! THAT'S JUST NOT RIGHT!!!)Lol</blockquote>

Verification