Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wik" data-source="post: 3094410" data-attributes="member: 40177">Stone is a great book, in my humble opinion.  And that's been said already.I don't own Dragon or Eberron, so I can't say either way.  Destiny is pretty much useless (there's a good 30-odd pages on human culture and personality.... YEAH!), except for the section on randomly building cities, which I photocopied and keep with me - it was a friend's book, and I hated the whole thing but that chapter.As for Wild.... I don't know about the racial advice - Elves and Halflings are nice races, and I do like the info they gave on halflings.  Raptorans SUCK, though, and most of the PrCs and feats were uninspiring.  However, the actual race descriptions were pretty good,and I know I've used the book a fair amount in my games (my last character was a halfling druid that took some options from this book).Currently, I'm using both STONE and WILD in my upcoming Savage Tide game;  I have a Goliath fighter (he can do a whopping 3d6+9 damage with one swing, and he's only a 2nd level character), and a Catfolk Rogue with a dexterity of 22.  Both races are fun, and well worth the +1 LA.  I'm really looking forward to seeing how well they do in play.</blockquote>