Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which Ranger Companion Solution Do You Prefer/Use
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 9682647" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>I’ll wait to vote</p><p></p><p>But my wife likes using 2024 but the primal companion is replaced by an expert sidekick. She also used the revised BM for years and it was good, but she wanted to switch to 2024 and the dm for that campaign offered some class fixes that might make her either switch to pure ranger (she’s currently more Druid) or make Druid the smaller part of her build, and companion as expert is a big pet of that. </p><p></p><p>I’ve seen people propose using the Battlesmith as a model for the BM, complete with at-will healing and giving the beast a protective reaction and making its attacks deal force damage. I’ve also seen proposals that suggest that freeing up the rangers action economy solves the issues with the subclass, or that making the beast share spell effects with you from level 3 does so. </p><p></p><p>I have different ideas as well, such as letting the beast help, disengage, or dash, as a bonus action (no requirement on your actions) and adding the steel defender’s protective reaction, so the beast can always at least give you advantage every single round of combat. </p><p></p><p>I also like the idea of giving the BM find familiar. No buffs to the spell, just let them have a secondary magic beast pet that is more for utility. </p><p></p><p>A friend suggested using find familiar but opening the choices up to any beast, fey, or monstrosity, with a 4 or lower intelligence, under a certain CR, and removing the non-attacking clause. That seems more complicated and needs more testing than other options, however, so it isn’t one I super like. </p><p></p><p>One I do kinda potentially like is to copy and rewrite either summon beast or Find Steed, give the resulting spell to BM with 1/day free cast, complete with “it gains more stuff if you cast as at level 4” and general scaling by spell level. for SB you’d modify it to the spell to last indefinitely like find steed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 9682647, member: 6704184"] I’ll wait to vote But my wife likes using 2024 but the primal companion is replaced by an expert sidekick. She also used the revised BM for years and it was good, but she wanted to switch to 2024 and the dm for that campaign offered some class fixes that might make her either switch to pure ranger (she’s currently more Druid) or make Druid the smaller part of her build, and companion as expert is a big pet of that. I’ve seen people propose using the Battlesmith as a model for the BM, complete with at-will healing and giving the beast a protective reaction and making its attacks deal force damage. I’ve also seen proposals that suggest that freeing up the rangers action economy solves the issues with the subclass, or that making the beast share spell effects with you from level 3 does so. I have different ideas as well, such as letting the beast help, disengage, or dash, as a bonus action (no requirement on your actions) and adding the steel defender’s protective reaction, so the beast can always at least give you advantage every single round of combat. I also like the idea of giving the BM find familiar. No buffs to the spell, just let them have a secondary magic beast pet that is more for utility. A friend suggested using find familiar but opening the choices up to any beast, fey, or monstrosity, with a 4 or lower intelligence, under a certain CR, and removing the non-attacking clause. That seems more complicated and needs more testing than other options, however, so it isn’t one I super like. One I do kinda potentially like is to copy and rewrite either summon beast or Find Steed, give the resulting spell to BM with 1/day free cast, complete with “it gains more stuff if you cast as at level 4” and general scaling by spell level. for SB you’d modify it to the spell to last indefinitely like find steed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which Ranger Companion Solution Do You Prefer/Use
Top