Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which type of True Neutral are you?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stormonu" data-source="post: 9310127" data-attributes="member: 52734"><p>Sounds like the difference between "Mordenkainen Neutral" and the later Unaligned to me.</p><p></p><p>As I recall, Gygax used to claim Mordenkainen as True Neutral in that he had his character seeking to ever balance the scales of good and evil, law and chaos - at least outwardly. His character wasn't a reactionist, but planned his actions - when one force became too entrenched, he'd act as a counterpoint to bring things back to center, changing allegiances or taking direct action himself. In actions there was his willingness to work with the evil Sir Rolibar, his mental domination of Bigby to "reform" the wizard and other (selfish) acts that sometimes benefited one extreme or another, but always was to his own benefit.</p><p></p><p>Druidic principles for older editions were of a similar thought - neither Good nor Evil, nor Law nor Chaos had the right to hold sway - there was a time and a place for each force and allowing one to reign dominant was abhorrent to the natural cycle of the world. Too much good and natural selection cannot take place and a species/society grows weak. Too much Evil and natural selection cannot occur as everything is a target to corruption, death and animosity. Too much Law, and the world becomes stagnant and unchanging, unable to adapt and grow. Too much Chaos and there is no dependable cycle of birth, growth and death - the continuation of species is put too much at risk.</p><p></p><p>The other end of that is sort of the "survivalist" mentality of Unaligned - do whatever needs to be done in the moment to stay alive and ultimately benefit yourself (and possibly others). Acts of goodness may be performed not out of a sense of necessity or altruism, but an understanding of like often invokes like - doing good to others reflects back in similar acts performed to your benefit. An unaligned might resort to evil if they felt oppressed or jilted - an eye for an eye and perhaps then some, if one could get away with it. Same for lawful behavior - being organized, working in a group or following the laws of the land being honored and done so because it makes your own life easier. Being chaotic in independent thought, rebellion or being spurious because it suits the situation.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I posit myself in the range of Chaotic Good (with some Lawful tenancies), so my outlook may be skewed. From my point of view, there are few people or things I would classify as actively Neutral, but I can settle with the idea of a great many being Unaligned. More likely, I feel most simply aren't introspective enough to know where they might sit on D&D's alignment scale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stormonu, post: 9310127, member: 52734"] Sounds like the difference between "Mordenkainen Neutral" and the later Unaligned to me. As I recall, Gygax used to claim Mordenkainen as True Neutral in that he had his character seeking to ever balance the scales of good and evil, law and chaos - at least outwardly. His character wasn't a reactionist, but planned his actions - when one force became too entrenched, he'd act as a counterpoint to bring things back to center, changing allegiances or taking direct action himself. In actions there was his willingness to work with the evil Sir Rolibar, his mental domination of Bigby to "reform" the wizard and other (selfish) acts that sometimes benefited one extreme or another, but always was to his own benefit. Druidic principles for older editions were of a similar thought - neither Good nor Evil, nor Law nor Chaos had the right to hold sway - there was a time and a place for each force and allowing one to reign dominant was abhorrent to the natural cycle of the world. Too much good and natural selection cannot take place and a species/society grows weak. Too much Evil and natural selection cannot occur as everything is a target to corruption, death and animosity. Too much Law, and the world becomes stagnant and unchanging, unable to adapt and grow. Too much Chaos and there is no dependable cycle of birth, growth and death - the continuation of species is put too much at risk. The other end of that is sort of the "survivalist" mentality of Unaligned - do whatever needs to be done in the moment to stay alive and ultimately benefit yourself (and possibly others). Acts of goodness may be performed not out of a sense of necessity or altruism, but an understanding of like often invokes like - doing good to others reflects back in similar acts performed to your benefit. An unaligned might resort to evil if they felt oppressed or jilted - an eye for an eye and perhaps then some, if one could get away with it. Same for lawful behavior - being organized, working in a group or following the laws of the land being honored and done so because it makes your own life easier. Being chaotic in independent thought, rebellion or being spurious because it suits the situation. Personally, I posit myself in the range of Chaotic Good (with some Lawful tenancies), so my outlook may be skewed. From my point of view, there are few people or things I would classify as actively Neutral, but I can settle with the idea of a great many being Unaligned. More likely, I feel most simply aren't introspective enough to know where they might sit on D&D's alignment scale. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Which type of True Neutral are you?
Top