Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LordEntrails" data-source="post: 8106173" data-attributes="member: 6804070">This is certainly not the way I remember the conversation developing. So much so that I'm concerned I may have come across in a way I certainly don't wish to and just to be sure I've gone back through the post history of this thread just to see. And here's what I found;We both post a few times in this thread with nothing of note. (i.e. no exchange or response to each other, no significant comments).Then I make this comment in response to MNBlockhead;Which elicited a response and exchange with Oofta who got that my comment was meant as humor.Then apparently out of no where, as you had mot been tagged, mentioned or seemingly otherwise referred to reply with this;Which quite frankly was baffling. Because I see no statements from anyone in this thread that are even remotely those of an "ardent defender". Perhaps you were referring to me as a "usual ardent defender"? But if you had actually read my posts, I put just as many qualifiers on my statements about why I like FG for my use case as you did about what you do and don't like about FG. I also don't see any posts calling or even inferring you are "trolling". Yes there were mentions of trolls in the humorous exchange between Oofta and myself, but humor man, and not even aimed in the general direction of you or anyone at all.To this, because you had quoted me in your above expression I replied. Calling you out on your false statements and asking to stop trolling, since you said you were trolling. Though honestly I understood you were not being serious. You should have understood my statement was in the same vein as yours.And you continued off the deep end here. (which I won't bother to quote) Saying (wrongly) that Oofta was calling you a troll (which he clearly wasn't as you were again not even mentioned etc). And then you said I wasn't even in on the joke I started, and you tried supporting your false statement with an argument that just didn't support your case. Which I again called you on. And now in the end your response is that I'm being pedantic for calling you on a false statement. And then you are saying I called you a troll. Which again never happened.No where have I personally attacked you. I have called out your false statements, which you have made at least 3 of now (1 about pull down menus. 2 that Oofta called you a troll, and 3, that I caused you a troll). And I will keep calling you out when you make blatantly false statements because honesty and the truth are important.It appears to me you are either reading things into posts that are not being written, or forgetting what was previously said in a thread/conversation. It also appears that you seem to think any negative (even humorous comments) is always directed at you, when they are not. May I suggest you take a moment to re-read the thread and reconsider your view of what was said and meant.</blockquote>

Verification