Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which Weapon Proficiency System Characteristics Do You Prefer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="airwalkrr" data-source="post: 3323406" data-attributes="member: 12460"><p>I am conflicted about something. I like the weapon proficiency systems in all three editions of the game, including some variants, for various reasons, but none of them stand out. For those unfamiliar with the systems, here is the basic idea of each.</p><p></p><p><strong>1e AD&D and 2e AD&D</strong></p><p>Each character class chooses a small number of weapon proficiencies at 1st level and gains an additional proficiency at set increments of levels. Martial classes like fighter and paladin gain more at 1st level and gain additional proficiencies more often than less martial classes like thieves and spellcasters like clerics or magic-users (the 1e version of the wizard). Additionally, each class receives a different penalty when using weapon with which the character is not proficient with martial classes having a lesser penalty.</p><p></p><p><strong>3e D&D</strong></p><p>Each character class has the same weapon proficiencies as every other member of that character class. The weapon proficiency lists are fairly extensive, often including all weapons of a particular class (such as martial weapons). These lists are often specialized only by characters wishing to take weapon proficiency feats (a rare occurence except in the case of exotic weapons). Weapon nonproficiency penalties are universal (-4).</p><p></p><p><strong>Weapon Groups</strong></p><p>I forget where this system originated, but I know it was around before 3e. An example appears in the 3e Unearthed Arcana. Much like AD&D core rules, each class chooses proficiency with a certain number of weapons, however the choice is limited to classes of weapons like small swords or spears, rather than individual weapons. For example, a fighter might be proficient in large swords, axes, and spears. In some variants, characters gain new weapon proficiencies at various levels often based on the nature of the class. Weapon nonproficiency penalties may be universal or may be based on class.</p><p></p><p>So which characteristics do you prefer to play with? Feel free to discuss your choice in addition to voting in the poll since I am interested in reasons as well as pure opinions. For clarification on the poll, I expect for you to vote for at least one option from choices 1-3, at least one option from choices 4-5, and at least one option from choices 6-8 (i.e. vote for a minimum of three characteristics). Feel free to select more than three characteristics however if you enjoy playing with more than just one or have no strong preference for what you consider to be otherwise good choices.</p><p></p><p>Myself, I like the idea of personalized lists, but I enjoy the simplicity of 3e blanket proficiencies giving players little to worry about. I feel perhaps weapon groups is the best compromise, but then how to deal with it? I am not familiar with Basic and Expert editions although my understanding is that they were somewhat simpler than 1e AD&D.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="airwalkrr, post: 3323406, member: 12460"] I am conflicted about something. I like the weapon proficiency systems in all three editions of the game, including some variants, for various reasons, but none of them stand out. For those unfamiliar with the systems, here is the basic idea of each. [b]1e AD&D and 2e AD&D[/b] Each character class chooses a small number of weapon proficiencies at 1st level and gains an additional proficiency at set increments of levels. Martial classes like fighter and paladin gain more at 1st level and gain additional proficiencies more often than less martial classes like thieves and spellcasters like clerics or magic-users (the 1e version of the wizard). Additionally, each class receives a different penalty when using weapon with which the character is not proficient with martial classes having a lesser penalty. [b]3e D&D[/b] Each character class has the same weapon proficiencies as every other member of that character class. The weapon proficiency lists are fairly extensive, often including all weapons of a particular class (such as martial weapons). These lists are often specialized only by characters wishing to take weapon proficiency feats (a rare occurence except in the case of exotic weapons). Weapon nonproficiency penalties are universal (-4). [b]Weapon Groups[/b] I forget where this system originated, but I know it was around before 3e. An example appears in the 3e Unearthed Arcana. Much like AD&D core rules, each class chooses proficiency with a certain number of weapons, however the choice is limited to classes of weapons like small swords or spears, rather than individual weapons. For example, a fighter might be proficient in large swords, axes, and spears. In some variants, characters gain new weapon proficiencies at various levels often based on the nature of the class. Weapon nonproficiency penalties may be universal or may be based on class. So which characteristics do you prefer to play with? Feel free to discuss your choice in addition to voting in the poll since I am interested in reasons as well as pure opinions. For clarification on the poll, I expect for you to vote for at least one option from choices 1-3, at least one option from choices 4-5, and at least one option from choices 6-8 (i.e. vote for a minimum of three characteristics). Feel free to select more than three characteristics however if you enjoy playing with more than just one or have no strong preference for what you consider to be otherwise good choices. Myself, I like the idea of personalized lists, but I enjoy the simplicity of 3e blanket proficiencies giving players little to worry about. I feel perhaps weapon groups is the best compromise, but then how to deal with it? I am not familiar with Basic and Expert editions although my understanding is that they were somewhat simpler than 1e AD&D. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which Weapon Proficiency System Characteristics Do You Prefer?
Top