Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which would you rather have in your party?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lord Pendragon" data-source="post: 1679258" data-attributes="member: 707"><p>Scion has spelled out a lot of good points that I agree with.</p><p></p><p>It just doesn't seem like the template is equal or far more powerful than the paladin+cohort. On top of that, Leadership usually gets <em>stronger</em> as you level up. By 20th-level, it seems obvious that a party would be better off with a 20th-level human paladin and an 18th-level cleric, than with a 20th-level half-celestial paladin. Each level the party gains weakens the template in comparison to the cohort.Fair enough. But the fact that 50+ people would choose the paladin+cleric over 3 people choosing the half-celestial paladin, leads me to believe that the general ENWorld consensus is that the cohort would be more powerful than what I'm suggesting.This is the crux of it. I've been reading and re-reading the paladin spell list. The crappy spells, combined with the horrendous caster level, means paladin spells are worthless with two exception. <em>Bless Weapon</em> and <em>Holy Sword</em>. Cleric spellcasting is anything but. The 8th-level cleric could hit the paladin with <em>Greater Magic Weapon</em> every morning and the occasional <em>Divine Favor</em>, at a cleric's caster level, and more than equal the paladin's entire spellcasting ability. :/No, I'm well-aware of the bonuses granted by the half-celestial template. The wings are nice, but our campaign is mainly a dungeon-crawl, so a place to unfurl those babies, and room to use them, is going to be hard to come by. Also, the paladin is a melee-focused character, so just flying at range and shooting arrows isn't going to do it. No archery feats + bad Dex = bad ranged attacks. So the wings come down to occasional usefulness in avoiding obstacles--like walls--rather than the extreme combat power that a flying wizard might enjoy.</p><p></p><p>The template grants several nice defensive bonuses, and a couple good offensive ones, but these don't seem much stronger than what an 8th-level cleric could provide.This is a very important point. I'm not asking "is the half-celestial template worth a feat?" I'm asking "Is the half-celestial template too much to ask instead of a cohort?" The balance problem you are objecting to is with regards to Leadership itself, which is another topic entirely. Here, I'm asking, in a game where Leadership is allowed, would my proposal be totally out of whack? I tend to believe it's not.Well, from the replies in this thread and the voting, it seems fair to say this is a matter of debate. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I partially agree. The cohort is an independent character, who gains a share of loot and xp. However, the cohort is dedicated to the PC. He <em>will</em> follow reasonable commands, he <em>will</em> place the PC's needs above any other party member's, he <em>will</em> use his abilities to assist the PC as best he can. He's not just a hireling, he's a devoted subordinate. Because of that, I don't think it's an assumption to say that the paladin will benefit from most of his abilities, or that he'll act in the paladin's best interests in nearly every circumstance.I don't think it's so definite. The abilities are nice, but not overwhelming. In any case this thread has shown me that it's close enough to balanced for me to approach my DM with the idea. If he approves it and it gets out of hand, he can always dial it back later. I definitely agree about wanting more feats. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> But I like Leadership. And I love the rp-idea of a half-celestial paladin. Even more, a paladin who is human, and being blessed with an infusion of divine energy, or as Scion mentioned, joined with a symbiotic celestial spirit.</p><p></p><p>Thanks to everyone who's participating in this thread. It's really helpful to be able to poll this community and get a general feel for how an idea would be received.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lord Pendragon, post: 1679258, member: 707"] Scion has spelled out a lot of good points that I agree with. It just doesn't seem like the template is equal or far more powerful than the paladin+cohort. On top of that, Leadership usually gets [i]stronger[/i] as you level up. By 20th-level, it seems obvious that a party would be better off with a 20th-level human paladin and an 18th-level cleric, than with a 20th-level half-celestial paladin. Each level the party gains weakens the template in comparison to the cohort.Fair enough. But the fact that 50+ people would choose the paladin+cleric over 3 people choosing the half-celestial paladin, leads me to believe that the general ENWorld consensus is that the cohort would be more powerful than what I'm suggesting.This is the crux of it. I've been reading and re-reading the paladin spell list. The crappy spells, combined with the horrendous caster level, means paladin spells are worthless with two exception. [i]Bless Weapon[/i] and [i]Holy Sword[/i]. Cleric spellcasting is anything but. The 8th-level cleric could hit the paladin with [i]Greater Magic Weapon[/i] every morning and the occasional [i]Divine Favor[/i], at a cleric's caster level, and more than equal the paladin's entire spellcasting ability. :/No, I'm well-aware of the bonuses granted by the half-celestial template. The wings are nice, but our campaign is mainly a dungeon-crawl, so a place to unfurl those babies, and room to use them, is going to be hard to come by. Also, the paladin is a melee-focused character, so just flying at range and shooting arrows isn't going to do it. No archery feats + bad Dex = bad ranged attacks. So the wings come down to occasional usefulness in avoiding obstacles--like walls--rather than the extreme combat power that a flying wizard might enjoy. The template grants several nice defensive bonuses, and a couple good offensive ones, but these don't seem much stronger than what an 8th-level cleric could provide.This is a very important point. I'm not asking "is the half-celestial template worth a feat?" I'm asking "Is the half-celestial template too much to ask instead of a cohort?" The balance problem you are objecting to is with regards to Leadership itself, which is another topic entirely. Here, I'm asking, in a game where Leadership is allowed, would my proposal be totally out of whack? I tend to believe it's not.Well, from the replies in this thread and the voting, it seems fair to say this is a matter of debate. :)I partially agree. The cohort is an independent character, who gains a share of loot and xp. However, the cohort is dedicated to the PC. He [i]will[/i] follow reasonable commands, he [i]will[/i] place the PC's needs above any other party member's, he [i]will[/i] use his abilities to assist the PC as best he can. He's not just a hireling, he's a devoted subordinate. Because of that, I don't think it's an assumption to say that the paladin will benefit from most of his abilities, or that he'll act in the paladin's best interests in nearly every circumstance.I don't think it's so definite. The abilities are nice, but not overwhelming. In any case this thread has shown me that it's close enough to balanced for me to approach my DM with the idea. If he approves it and it gets out of hand, he can always dial it back later. I definitely agree about wanting more feats. :p But I like Leadership. And I love the rp-idea of a half-celestial paladin. Even more, a paladin who is human, and being blessed with an infusion of divine energy, or as Scion mentioned, joined with a symbiotic celestial spirit. Thanks to everyone who's participating in this thread. It's really helpful to be able to poll this community and get a general feel for how an idea would be received. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which would you rather have in your party?
Top