Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Whirling Blade with Arcane Strike
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark1733" data-source="post: 6498569" data-attributes="member: 83142"><p>Just to be clear, I was interpreting the feat as channel one spell, but then I saw the post that seemed to interpret otherwise. Upon rereading it, I think it could be stretched to channel multiple spells...but then upon reading the potential for coupling it with <em>Whirling Blade</em> (a 2nd level spell), it seems like it could be way too much damage. I could technically cast <em>whirling blade</em> and channel three 5th level spells into each of my melee attacks. From the feat alone, that would be a +15 to hit and then additional 15d4 damage per attack. If I get a good line of opponents within range...lets say 5 opponents...that's a total of an additional 75d4 (75-300 pts) points of damage potentially in one spell action. So...my 5th level spell is <em>prismatic ray</em> and I can cast three of them per day. If I cast 3 of those (instead of channeling), I could presumably luck out with 80 points of electrical damage from each one (totalling 240 pts of "guaranteed" damage), or turning to stone, or sending to another plane provided I get past spell resistance and reflex saves. And I would have cast each one separately over three separate turns. Now let's say I dump all my remaining spells (7 1sts, 7 2nds, 7 3rds, etc) into the <em>whirling blade</em>...my attack bonus is off the charts. I am pretty much guaranteed to hit every target that is affected by normal physical damage and slice every one of them up like a spiral-sliced ham. Granted that is an extreme hypothetical scenario, but I cannot legitimately believe that would have been intended.</p><p></p><p>Sorry that I had to work out that math for myself...all of your previous posts all summarized this nicely. I appreciate the input. I will ask my DM, but I think I will end up with a single spell sacrifice interpretation. I am okay with that...I don't want lots of math <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Thanks, all!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark1733, post: 6498569, member: 83142"] Just to be clear, I was interpreting the feat as channel one spell, but then I saw the post that seemed to interpret otherwise. Upon rereading it, I think it could be stretched to channel multiple spells...but then upon reading the potential for coupling it with [I]Whirling Blade[/I] (a 2nd level spell), it seems like it could be way too much damage. I could technically cast [I]whirling blade[/I] and channel three 5th level spells into each of my melee attacks. From the feat alone, that would be a +15 to hit and then additional 15d4 damage per attack. If I get a good line of opponents within range...lets say 5 opponents...that's a total of an additional 75d4 (75-300 pts) points of damage potentially in one spell action. So...my 5th level spell is [I]prismatic ray[/I] and I can cast three of them per day. If I cast 3 of those (instead of channeling), I could presumably luck out with 80 points of electrical damage from each one (totalling 240 pts of "guaranteed" damage), or turning to stone, or sending to another plane provided I get past spell resistance and reflex saves. And I would have cast each one separately over three separate turns. Now let's say I dump all my remaining spells (7 1sts, 7 2nds, 7 3rds, etc) into the [I]whirling blade[/I]...my attack bonus is off the charts. I am pretty much guaranteed to hit every target that is affected by normal physical damage and slice every one of them up like a spiral-sliced ham. Granted that is an extreme hypothetical scenario, but I cannot legitimately believe that would have been intended. Sorry that I had to work out that math for myself...all of your previous posts all summarized this nicely. I appreciate the input. I will ask my DM, but I think I will end up with a single spell sacrifice interpretation. I am okay with that...I don't want lots of math :) Thanks, all! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Whirling Blade with Arcane Strike
Top