Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
whirling rend and like powers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tgwg" data-source="post: 5072780" data-attributes="member: 83331"><p>well in this case it's not so certain. the main discrestion is that does whirling rend count as 2 damage rolls or 1. if it where 1 damage roll you're right the enhancement bonuses wouldn't stack, but if it's 2 then you would apply the enhancement bonus (among other things) on both of them.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>except for the fact that 1 hit with whirling rend counts as 2 "hits" with twin strike. that and the fact that +attack to next attack roll is much more common than +attack to all attac rolls and you're now in a bind. if we look at it statistically with 15 being a hit then</p><p> </p><p>whirling rend </p><p>75% to do full damage</p><p>25% do no damage</p><p> </p><p>so 75% damage average</p><p> </p><p>twin strike</p><p>56.25% do full damage</p><p>37.5% do half damage</p><p>6.25% do no damage</p><p> </p><p>so again 75% damage average.</p><p> </p><p>hm i guess you're right, they do average out, if they were using the same damage output, but if you look at the chart i made in the Giantitp forum you'll see that the barbarian while in rage is about equals to the ranger in total damage. It outstrips the ranger if whirling rend has 2 damage rolls.</p><p> </p><p>and even if the damage output is equal don't forget that the tempust barbarian has more HP and AC then the two weapon ranger. so if the barbararians <strong>damage output equals</strong> the rangers, has <strong>beter defense</strong> then the ranger and fufills the same roll as the ranger (striker) <strong>then</strong> tempust <strong>barbarian >>> Two weapon ranger</strong>. this would make the tempust barbarian a gamebreaker to the 4e standards of balance. </p><p> </p><p>If whirling rend counts as 1 damage roll it would be more balanced because it would only achieve ranger level damage while raging.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>that is true, and i'm having a hard time trying to figure out how that comes into the equation.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>not as much as you think. While it is true that the ranger has another chance at criting it averages out that the ranger would crit 5.25 % more than the barbarian, if crits only happen at natural 20.</p><p> </p><p>and then there's the whole deal that if whirling rend does count as 2 damage rolls then a magic item critical damage would apply to both the main weapon target and off hand weapon target.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tgwg, post: 5072780, member: 83331"] well in this case it's not so certain. the main discrestion is that does whirling rend count as 2 damage rolls or 1. if it where 1 damage roll you're right the enhancement bonuses wouldn't stack, but if it's 2 then you would apply the enhancement bonus (among other things) on both of them. except for the fact that 1 hit with whirling rend counts as 2 "hits" with twin strike. that and the fact that +attack to next attack roll is much more common than +attack to all attac rolls and you're now in a bind. if we look at it statistically with 15 being a hit then whirling rend 75% to do full damage 25% do no damage so 75% damage average twin strike 56.25% do full damage 37.5% do half damage 6.25% do no damage so again 75% damage average. hm i guess you're right, they do average out, if they were using the same damage output, but if you look at the chart i made in the Giantitp forum you'll see that the barbarian while in rage is about equals to the ranger in total damage. It outstrips the ranger if whirling rend has 2 damage rolls. and even if the damage output is equal don't forget that the tempust barbarian has more HP and AC then the two weapon ranger. so if the barbararians [B]damage output equals[/B] the rangers, has [B]beter defense[/B] then the ranger and fufills the same roll as the ranger (striker) [B]then[/B] tempust [B]barbarian >>> Two weapon ranger[/B]. this would make the tempust barbarian a gamebreaker to the 4e standards of balance. If whirling rend counts as 1 damage roll it would be more balanced because it would only achieve ranger level damage while raging. that is true, and i'm having a hard time trying to figure out how that comes into the equation. not as much as you think. While it is true that the ranger has another chance at criting it averages out that the ranger would crit 5.25 % more than the barbarian, if crits only happen at natural 20. and then there's the whole deal that if whirling rend does count as 2 damage rolls then a magic item critical damage would apply to both the main weapon target and off hand weapon target. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
whirling rend and like powers
Top