Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
whirling rend and like powers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blackbrrd" data-source="post: 5073039" data-attributes="member: 63962"><p>Now then, I don't get the part where you put 18/18 in str/wis for a two-weapon ranger. He is probably much better of with a 20/15 split and go for scalemail.</p><p></p><p>When it comes to the bow-ranger he is better of with a 20/15 dex/wis split giving him better AC than the Barbarian, and AC is the most important defense? Oh, regarding that - I think it's something like this: AC 50%, Ref 20%, Fort 15%, Will 15%. In other words AC/Ref is the most important. The bow ranger comes out on top I believe. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>When it comes to the barbarian, he is going to go for a 20/15 str/dex split or a 18/18 str/dex split. If he goes for the first his AC will be very bad. I think most players would go for 18/18 or maybe 19/17.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, as noted above it's easier for the Ranger, especially the bow-ranger to go for a 20 main stat, and really that makes the Ranger quite a bit more offensive. A 20 vs an 18 main stat is about a 5-15% difference in DPR.</p><p></p><p>Mostly I think we agree here, this is just nitpicking. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Hmm... I think I managed to misplace my point here. The Ranger is more precise, being able to deliver the damage where he wants. The Barbarian has to attack where he can get adjacent to two foes. This is especially true for the Bow-ranger which I personally think is more valuable than a dual-wield ranger.</p><p></p><p>When it comes down to utility-powers the Ranger wins when it comes to damage avoidance. He will probably just shift all over the place, and with the bow-ranger starting at range he is nearly impossible to pin down*.</p><p></p><p>*From experience as a DM. If my mobs went after the bow-ranger it is a waste of time 90% of the time. I need to get the Ranger dazed or immobilized to have any chance of taking him down before my mobs all die, having wasted lots of actions on the bow ranger. Hmm did I mention I think the bow-ranger is a VERY good build, not just for DPR, but for just being a pain and focus-firing all my mobs down? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blackbrrd, post: 5073039, member: 63962"] Now then, I don't get the part where you put 18/18 in str/wis for a two-weapon ranger. He is probably much better of with a 20/15 split and go for scalemail. When it comes to the bow-ranger he is better of with a 20/15 dex/wis split giving him better AC than the Barbarian, and AC is the most important defense? Oh, regarding that - I think it's something like this: AC 50%, Ref 20%, Fort 15%, Will 15%. In other words AC/Ref is the most important. The bow ranger comes out on top I believe. ;) When it comes to the barbarian, he is going to go for a 20/15 str/dex split or a 18/18 str/dex split. If he goes for the first his AC will be very bad. I think most players would go for 18/18 or maybe 19/17. Anyway, as noted above it's easier for the Ranger, especially the bow-ranger to go for a 20 main stat, and really that makes the Ranger quite a bit more offensive. A 20 vs an 18 main stat is about a 5-15% difference in DPR. Mostly I think we agree here, this is just nitpicking. ;) Hmm... I think I managed to misplace my point here. The Ranger is more precise, being able to deliver the damage where he wants. The Barbarian has to attack where he can get adjacent to two foes. This is especially true for the Bow-ranger which I personally think is more valuable than a dual-wield ranger. When it comes down to utility-powers the Ranger wins when it comes to damage avoidance. He will probably just shift all over the place, and with the bow-ranger starting at range he is nearly impossible to pin down*. *From experience as a DM. If my mobs went after the bow-ranger it is a waste of time 90% of the time. I need to get the Ranger dazed or immobilized to have any chance of taking him down before my mobs all die, having wasted lots of actions on the bow ranger. Hmm did I mention I think the bow-ranger is a VERY good build, not just for DPR, but for just being a pain and focus-firing all my mobs down? ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
whirling rend and like powers
Top