Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
whirling rend and like powers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tgwg" data-source="post: 5073200" data-attributes="member: 83331"><p>by "versatile" do you mean the fact that the ranger has the option of spreading out his damage or focusing it? </p><p> </p><p>versatility vs beter defenses and hp?</p><p> </p><p>it still doesn't seem like a fair trade</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>i think you're reading the rules wrong. Effects that add +attack to the next attack roll can only affect 1 attack roll so even if 2 attack rolls happen simultaneously you have to chose which one adds the +attack. or i could be mistaken, could we get a third vote here?</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>viable isn't the same as superior. the ranger has to spend 2 feats on armor proficiency and still isn't near the barbarian's level of defense or hp for that matter</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>again "well enough" vs superior. should i make a chart concerning their respective defenses?</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>hunter's quary is not a separate damage roll. it is an "extra damage roll." it's added on to an existing damage roll so it doesn't get any modifiers unless a feat or ability overrides this rule. the reason why whirling rend is disputed is because it's ambiguous if the second "damage roll" is realy a damage roll or an effect that just uses the dice size of your offhand weapon.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>have i made an error in my calculations or is there a particular part of my example that doesn't sense that i could possibly make clearer.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>the "two rolls" rule does seem more logical and it actualy has backup according to the power itself. what i'm worried about is that, under this ruling, the tempest barbarian would be better then the two weapon ranger and upset the balance that I love about 4e. (that and break the game my friend is DMing)</p><p> </p><p>i guess i'm just waiting for The Wizard's ruling on this. If The Wizard says it's 1 roll then it's 1 roll. If the Wizard says it's 2 rolls then i'll be an INCREADIBLY HAPPY MUNCHKIN. </p><p> </p><p>There is a Huge way for this to be taken advantage of, much more then you may think.</p><p> </p><p>p.s. what is the ruling behind Rain of steel. sorry i'm not familiar with that one. is enhancement bonus and or weapon focus added?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tgwg, post: 5073200, member: 83331"] by "versatile" do you mean the fact that the ranger has the option of spreading out his damage or focusing it? versatility vs beter defenses and hp? it still doesn't seem like a fair trade i think you're reading the rules wrong. Effects that add +attack to the next attack roll can only affect 1 attack roll so even if 2 attack rolls happen simultaneously you have to chose which one adds the +attack. or i could be mistaken, could we get a third vote here? viable isn't the same as superior. the ranger has to spend 2 feats on armor proficiency and still isn't near the barbarian's level of defense or hp for that matter again "well enough" vs superior. should i make a chart concerning their respective defenses? hunter's quary is not a separate damage roll. it is an "extra damage roll." it's added on to an existing damage roll so it doesn't get any modifiers unless a feat or ability overrides this rule. the reason why whirling rend is disputed is because it's ambiguous if the second "damage roll" is realy a damage roll or an effect that just uses the dice size of your offhand weapon. have i made an error in my calculations or is there a particular part of my example that doesn't sense that i could possibly make clearer. the "two rolls" rule does seem more logical and it actualy has backup according to the power itself. what i'm worried about is that, under this ruling, the tempest barbarian would be better then the two weapon ranger and upset the balance that I love about 4e. (that and break the game my friend is DMing) i guess i'm just waiting for The Wizard's ruling on this. If The Wizard says it's 1 roll then it's 1 roll. If the Wizard says it's 2 rolls then i'll be an INCREADIBLY HAPPY MUNCHKIN. There is a Huge way for this to be taken advantage of, much more then you may think. p.s. what is the ruling behind Rain of steel. sorry i'm not familiar with that one. is enhancement bonus and or weapon focus added? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
whirling rend and like powers
Top