Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Whirlwind and Cleave?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IceBear" data-source="post: 151285" data-attributes="member: 1118"><p>Exactly how I see it too. I don't have any concerns about the fighter being unbalanced or too powerful if I allow this. That's not what it's about. What it's about is how I visualize these feats working, and with the fact that it's generally to your advantage to have numerical superiority. Allowing so many extra attacks against a powerful creature just because there are mooks around just seems....wrong....to me. Yes, the fighter is trained to fight in these situations, and even if I only allow one cleave per oppoent, he does outperform someone who isn't trained for that situation...nothing wrong there.</p><p></p><p>As Ywain and I have said the reality situation is one where you are probably only going to get one or two cleave attacks from the WWA anyway. I'm cool with that. It's the situation were somehow or another a pile of mooks are mixed into the situation I'm not. The fighter can quickly chop down the mooks with his feats and level the playing field, that's fine. I wouldn't want him to be able to use these mooks to get tons of extra FREE damage on the big bad boss and turn a tough, exciting battle into a breeze just because there were mooks around.</p><p></p><p>IceBear</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IceBear, post: 151285, member: 1118"] Exactly how I see it too. I don't have any concerns about the fighter being unbalanced or too powerful if I allow this. That's not what it's about. What it's about is how I visualize these feats working, and with the fact that it's generally to your advantage to have numerical superiority. Allowing so many extra attacks against a powerful creature just because there are mooks around just seems....wrong....to me. Yes, the fighter is trained to fight in these situations, and even if I only allow one cleave per oppoent, he does outperform someone who isn't trained for that situation...nothing wrong there. As Ywain and I have said the reality situation is one where you are probably only going to get one or two cleave attacks from the WWA anyway. I'm cool with that. It's the situation were somehow or another a pile of mooks are mixed into the situation I'm not. The fighter can quickly chop down the mooks with his feats and level the playing field, that's fine. I wouldn't want him to be able to use these mooks to get tons of extra FREE damage on the big bad boss and turn a tough, exciting battle into a breeze just because there were mooks around. IceBear [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Whirlwind and Cleave?
Top