Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="drnuncheon" data-source="post: 1078369" data-attributes="member: 96">Just out of curiosity, how would you word it to make it come out the other way?  Without prior knowledge of this discussion, I would have worded it the same way it was in the book - one attack at the highest bonus against each person in reach.  Just something to consider.  I think the default assumption in 3.5 is one attack roll per target - in fact, I can't think of any other time in the core rules where you would make a single attack roll and apply it to multiple targets.Also, if you are disarmed in the middle of your whirlwind attack, you could continue with it even if you don't have IUS...it just might not be wise.J</blockquote>