Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JackSmithIV" data-source="post: 4430217" data-attributes="member: 74901">Yes, but you're assuming I mean specifically Hunter or Vampire or the other WoD companion games. I mean World of Darkness. Just the core game, even. I was using Hunter as an example of their poor marketing skills (ie: someone here wasn't even sure if it had hit the shelf, I assume after they'd already gone the main site to check, where the date wasn't posted).As for just core World of Darkness and accesability, I could probably argue that more people are familiar with the idea of regular people getting sucked into paranormal happenings (most scary movies/shows/books in existance) than they are with most fantasy archetypes. Yes, there are descrepancies to be had, but let's face it. Show a person new to RP a D&D character sheet and a World of Darkness character sheet and ask which one is more intimidating to them as a new player. It's not always about the core system. Sometimes it's just the simple imagery.I just see so much unexplored potential. Which wouldn't be weird if the company hadn't published hundreds of book and been in role playing games longer than Wizards of the Coast. Sure, they don't have nearly the resources, but they should atleast know the importance of designing and updating a website.-IV</blockquote>