Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
White Wolfs pay to play deal...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tinner" data-source="post: 2398039" data-attributes="member: 19667"><p>Well, you'll notice I did say "rough estimate." Yes, OWbN does not track each member like the Cam does. That's exactly the kind of bureaucracy OWbN was formed to avoid. However, every player has to sign into their local game. Those numbers aren't publicly posted, but do get passed around internally. So yeah, if you want to say I pulled them out of an orifice, that's fine. Like I said, rough estimate. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is implying what exactly? That OWbN doesn't hold cons of their own? They do. Some very large ones at that. The Origins game is a big event, but it's far from the largest OWbN event. Things like the Midwinter Ball and Non-Klaive/Clave are MUCH larger games.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm sure the New WoD is doing "fine". But sales numbers flat out do NOT come close to matching those of previous versions of the WoD. So if WW was shooting for "fine" than they have certainly acheived it. BUt IMO "fine" isn't enough to carry a company the size of WW for too long.</p><p></p><p>I also question the idea that LARP has declined in popularity. Certainly the number of books being produced for LARPs hasn't decreased. WW cranked out plenty of MET books before the New WoD kicked off. There's Noir, Cthulu Live, SW Live, LA Paranoia, and a number of smaller, independant systems as well. I don't see that as an indication of declining popularity. All of the Con's I have attended in the last couple years have had plenty of well attended LARPs of all kinds. I played live action versions of Paranoia, Deadlands, Seventh Sea, Are You a Werewolf, Vampire, Werewolf, Changeling, Mage, Wraith, Star Wars, Cthulu and even checked out some homebrew super hero systems in the last two years. Where's the dramatic decline in popularity there?</p><p></p><p>Lastly, the idea that OWbN is irrelavent doesn't match up with WW's actions. They pretty much handed this policy to OWbN as a "cease & desist" notice, and have plainly said that the only groups this is meant to affect are the large organizations. If as you asert, that's just the Cam and OWbN, I hardly see how OWbN is "irrelavent" And if as you say OWbN doesn't mean much to the company, then clearly WW doesn't value sales, and "super-reccomnders" In the five years I was with OWbN, I would make a "rough estimate" that I personally introduced more than 100 people to WoD MET LARPs. with very few exceptions, each of those players bought a copy of the Core MET Vampire book. Most of them bought everything in Laws of the Night line, and some of them pretty much bought every new MET release as it came out. I'm certain that most of the OWbN games out there have similar numbers as well. I fail to see how that many purchases implies that "OWbN's members haven't meant much to the company in ages"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, at least we both agree the policy is a mistake. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tinner, post: 2398039, member: 19667"] Well, you'll notice I did say "rough estimate." Yes, OWbN does not track each member like the Cam does. That's exactly the kind of bureaucracy OWbN was formed to avoid. However, every player has to sign into their local game. Those numbers aren't publicly posted, but do get passed around internally. So yeah, if you want to say I pulled them out of an orifice, that's fine. Like I said, rough estimate. :D This is implying what exactly? That OWbN doesn't hold cons of their own? They do. Some very large ones at that. The Origins game is a big event, but it's far from the largest OWbN event. Things like the Midwinter Ball and Non-Klaive/Clave are MUCH larger games. I'm sure the New WoD is doing "fine". But sales numbers flat out do NOT come close to matching those of previous versions of the WoD. So if WW was shooting for "fine" than they have certainly acheived it. BUt IMO "fine" isn't enough to carry a company the size of WW for too long. I also question the idea that LARP has declined in popularity. Certainly the number of books being produced for LARPs hasn't decreased. WW cranked out plenty of MET books before the New WoD kicked off. There's Noir, Cthulu Live, SW Live, LA Paranoia, and a number of smaller, independant systems as well. I don't see that as an indication of declining popularity. All of the Con's I have attended in the last couple years have had plenty of well attended LARPs of all kinds. I played live action versions of Paranoia, Deadlands, Seventh Sea, Are You a Werewolf, Vampire, Werewolf, Changeling, Mage, Wraith, Star Wars, Cthulu and even checked out some homebrew super hero systems in the last two years. Where's the dramatic decline in popularity there? Lastly, the idea that OWbN is irrelavent doesn't match up with WW's actions. They pretty much handed this policy to OWbN as a "cease & desist" notice, and have plainly said that the only groups this is meant to affect are the large organizations. If as you asert, that's just the Cam and OWbN, I hardly see how OWbN is "irrelavent" And if as you say OWbN doesn't mean much to the company, then clearly WW doesn't value sales, and "super-reccomnders" In the five years I was with OWbN, I would make a "rough estimate" that I personally introduced more than 100 people to WoD MET LARPs. with very few exceptions, each of those players bought a copy of the Core MET Vampire book. Most of them bought everything in Laws of the Night line, and some of them pretty much bought every new MET release as it came out. I'm certain that most of the OWbN games out there have similar numbers as well. I fail to see how that many purchases implies that "OWbN's members haven't meant much to the company in ages" Well, at least we both agree the policy is a mistake. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
White Wolfs pay to play deal...
Top