Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dragonhelm" data-source="post: 3351932" data-attributes="member: 3867">From what I've gathered from the Trolls (and this is just my impression), it seems they were trying to get the feel of 1e, while creating an easy-to-use game system that takes some of the basic mechanics from 3e and is usable with any edition.Most C&C fans that I know seem to use a lot of AD&D materials and are probably the old schoolers for the most part.  There does seem to be a few out there who use some 3e-isms, but they are a minority for the most part.I'm sure I'm in the minority here, but I don't think that C&C has to be labeled an old school game.  Now I admit, it has some old school flavor to it (in a good way), but if it takes the best of all editions, then you would think more people would adapt more from 3e.When I switched my last game over to C&C from 3.5, I was not only using the same 3e books I had been using, I was also using some old AD&D books I hadn't used in a while.  It was great, because I was using materials from all editions to make my game better.  Which is part of the point, right?</blockquote>