Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CheezyRamen" data-source="post: 7116295" data-attributes="member: 6879767">So, obviously as everyone else is saying that if the DM is not hosting the game then it MUST be cleared with whomevers house is being used. That being said, In general IME it is a general consensus and if everyone isn't down to let a new player in then I don't think it should be pushed. That also being said, I think the DM should trump anyone else because he's the person that has to accommodate the other person more than anyone else. All in all, I think everyone should be open to letting new people experience DnD as a hobby even if it's a party of larger than 7. You can just throw some truly crazy stuff IMO. Or, you can split up the group for 2 sessions or maybe some players would like to play in more than one game and then bring the new person in with the other campaign. I don't think there really is a wrong answer, even if the answer is that the group doesn't want anyone else.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CheezyRamen, post: 7116295, member: 6879767"] So, obviously as everyone else is saying that if the DM is not hosting the game then it MUST be cleared with whomevers house is being used. That being said, In general IME it is a general consensus and if everyone isn't down to let a new player in then I don't think it should be pushed. That also being said, I think the DM should trump anyone else because he's the person that has to accommodate the other person more than anyone else. All in all, I think everyone should be open to letting new people experience DnD as a hobby even if it's a party of larger than 7. You can just throw some truly crazy stuff IMO. Or, you can split up the group for 2 sessions or maybe some players would like to play in more than one game and then bring the new person in with the other campaign. I don't think there really is a wrong answer, even if the answer is that the group doesn't want anyone else. [/QUOTE]

Verification