Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Helldritch" data-source="post: 8034714" data-attributes="member: 6855114">I checked the post, a few things come out as a bit outdated. Damage wise the monk is behind, the barb and the fighter. That much I agree. On damage taken however, the monk will take a lot less. Especially with mobility. Even without it, it will be better for the monk to take an opportunity than to stay static and take a hit. He can even reduce damage taken from thrown rocks (the example uses a fire giant). One other thing, why has he taken level 10? Going for level 12 would have been better as the fighter would get his third attack and more ASI or feat. I understand that level 10 was arbitrary taken but it was doing a disservice to the fighter. As the fighter gets more feats to compensate. I would also have taken a battlemaster as this fighter can do a lot of things with its maneuvers.I tend to be skeptical about these white room analysis. They can be a good indicator but they are not absolutely accurate. Too many factors can change the outcome.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Helldritch, post: 8034714, member: 6855114"] I checked the post, a few things come out as a bit outdated. Damage wise the monk is behind, the barb and the fighter. That much I agree. On damage taken however, the monk will take a lot less. Especially with mobility. Even without it, it will be better for the monk to take an opportunity than to stay static and take a hit. He can even reduce damage taken from thrown rocks (the example uses a fire giant). One other thing, why has he taken level 10? Going for level 12 would have been better as the fighter would get his third attack and more ASI or feat. I understand that level 10 was arbitrary taken but it was doing a disservice to the fighter. As the fighter gets more feats to compensate. I would also have taken a battlemaster as this fighter can do a lot of things with its maneuvers. I tend to be skeptical about these white room analysis. They can be a good indicator but they are not absolutely accurate. Too many factors can change the outcome. [/QUOTE]

Verification