Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sunshadow21" data-source="post: 7679287" data-attributes="member: 6667193"><p>But that semantics is important. Freelancing is something most people can handle; it's understood an rpg or a comic book is going to have rotating writers and artists. More importantly, it's an arrangement that has little to no impact on the vast majority of people, who have very different types of jobs and employment. The second that writer becomes a formal company, something changes. It becomes just familiar enough of a process that people can draw conclusions that, even if they miss a great number of details, are technically correct. It also becomes just familiar enough to potentially evoke emotions that WotC hiring 5 writers individually would not. So while it is "just" semantics, this is one case where those semantics can be just important enough to just enough people that it cannot simply be dismissed as edition bashing.</p></blockquote><p></p>