Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Who really IS the target audience of D&D Next?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ShinHakkaider" data-source="post: 5815282" data-attributes="member: 9213"><p>Well, I've been playing RPG's for a long time. </p><p></p><p>I have an entire bookshelf and and about 8gb of RPG materials. I've thrown away/ donated/ given away more RPG books annd materials than that one book shelf of material that I now own. </p><p></p><p>I have a fair amount of mini's both metal and pre-painted plastics.</p><p></p><p>I have never been to Gen-Con and have no desire to go (I love my hobby but I pretty much despise and hate the fandom. And that's a feeling that grows more and more the the more time that I spend on message board forums).</p><p></p><p>I too have no interest in "living campaigns". As I feel while for some it's the only way that they can get a regular game, I also feel that a fair amount of people who play in these games are power gamers and people who want to game the system. In short the type of people you dont want in your regular game. That may not be entirely true but that's just the way I feel. </p><p></p><p>D&D Next isnt going to be the all-inclusive edition. It only care about that in so much as regaining it's market share back from older editions and other games like Savage Worlds and Pathfinder. I'd pretty much bet now that WOTC's main order of business is to completely disrupt Pathfinder's momentum or destroy it completely. </p><p></p><p>If they really cared about all inclusiveness they'd let things be and focus on making the best game that they can without starting up the nostalgia train. For all their talk about how great 4E is and that it was what people wanted it now seems like they are kind of pushing it to the side sort of like what they did to 3.5. And that's a shame because as much as I didn't care for 4E it wasn't a bad game at all. </p><p></p><p>So who is their target audience? The OSR crowd? The Pathfinder crowd? </p><p></p><p>Is playing something with the D&D name on it really that important to most people? Apparently it is with all of the people from both the OSR group and supposed Pathfinder players eager to jump ship at first sight of the new shiny. </p><p></p><p>The one good thing about 4E (other than condensed monster stat blocks) was that it freed me from D&D. I havent played a game with D&D on the cover in 4 YEARS. That's the longest I've ever gone without playing something called D&D since I started player RPG's. But apparently while I can walk away from the brand and keep walking some people just cant. </p><p></p><p>So I'd say THAT'S the target audience. D&D fans. People who absolutley need to be playing something with that DUNGEONS & DRAGONS on the cover.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ShinHakkaider, post: 5815282, member: 9213"] Well, I've been playing RPG's for a long time. I have an entire bookshelf and and about 8gb of RPG materials. I've thrown away/ donated/ given away more RPG books annd materials than that one book shelf of material that I now own. I have a fair amount of mini's both metal and pre-painted plastics. I have never been to Gen-Con and have no desire to go (I love my hobby but I pretty much despise and hate the fandom. And that's a feeling that grows more and more the the more time that I spend on message board forums). I too have no interest in "living campaigns". As I feel while for some it's the only way that they can get a regular game, I also feel that a fair amount of people who play in these games are power gamers and people who want to game the system. In short the type of people you dont want in your regular game. That may not be entirely true but that's just the way I feel. D&D Next isnt going to be the all-inclusive edition. It only care about that in so much as regaining it's market share back from older editions and other games like Savage Worlds and Pathfinder. I'd pretty much bet now that WOTC's main order of business is to completely disrupt Pathfinder's momentum or destroy it completely. If they really cared about all inclusiveness they'd let things be and focus on making the best game that they can without starting up the nostalgia train. For all their talk about how great 4E is and that it was what people wanted it now seems like they are kind of pushing it to the side sort of like what they did to 3.5. And that's a shame because as much as I didn't care for 4E it wasn't a bad game at all. So who is their target audience? The OSR crowd? The Pathfinder crowd? Is playing something with the D&D name on it really that important to most people? Apparently it is with all of the people from both the OSR group and supposed Pathfinder players eager to jump ship at first sight of the new shiny. The one good thing about 4E (other than condensed monster stat blocks) was that it freed me from D&D. I havent played a game with D&D on the cover in 4 YEARS. That's the longest I've ever gone without playing something called D&D since I started player RPG's. But apparently while I can walk away from the brand and keep walking some people just cant. So I'd say THAT'S the target audience. D&D fans. People who absolutley need to be playing something with that DUNGEONS & DRAGONS on the cover. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Who really IS the target audience of D&D Next?
Top