Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 5817838" data-attributes="member: 996">Nod.  Pathfinder was an evolution of 3.5, obviously a bit better than it; 4e was a revolutionary improvement over 3.5 - a /lot/ better in a number of very important ways, but also very different, and thus possibly harder to accept.Of course, one of the biggest differences was in game balance, and game balance, which has the effect of putting everyone on a more-or-less even playing field /can/ get in the way of certain 'styles' of play.  Not to say that those styles are wrong, per se, but game balance is in effect a compromise that allows people to play the characters they want, the way they want, to the extent that doing so doesn't too negatively impact the play exerience for everyone else.</blockquote>