Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Who's Actually Read the DM's Guides
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rechan" data-source="post: 5764544" data-attributes="member: 54846"><p>Most of the issues IMO are not with that. Most of the "I don't like 4e" comes from:</p><p style="text-align: left"></p> <ul style="text-align: left"> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Actions specific to WotC: canceling the print Dragon/Dungeon, the way 4e was previewed/comments by the designers, lack of OGL. The layout of the books (limited fluff, uninteresting reads; the PHB and MM are all numbers no fluff). There were people outraged that the gnome/half-orc were not in PHB1 and Frost Giants weren't in the MM1.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Less simulationism, more gamist nature of the system (see the nod to Realism threads).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The way the system "Feels" (i.e. videogamey): marking techniques, fighters with "p0werz", the way healing powers work, the "sameness" of classes, etc.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Lack of some traditional D&D rules: vancian magic, shift from daily resources to encounter resources, over-emphasis on grid-based minis, lack of non-combat abilities (the Crafting Skill, charm person).</li> </ul> <p style="text-align: left">While they were working on 4e, they used certain design elements in late 3e books. Complete Mage had feats that allowed an at-will-ike spell ability, there was the Warlock Class who only had At Will powers, the Book of Nine Swords were a 3.5 interpretation of fighter/warlord powers. People complained about those for the video-gamey/non-realistic elements then. Many of the arguments today are the same arguments had when 4e was being previewed.</p> <p style="text-align: left"></p> <p style="text-align: left">The above elements would have have existed regardless of the DMG's advice. Once an impression was made about 4e, what the DMG <strong>actually</strong> said would not matter. And in my experience, people who passionately do not like something will find more things to dislike about the thing they dislike, and positive elements/counterpoints will have <strong>no</strong> impact. There's more psychology behind it but I think that's enough.</p> <p style="text-align: left"></p> <p style="text-align: left">Most of your "I'm having trouble running 4e" issues come from running skill challenges (which more has been written than any other topic), building encounters, and issues with the system itself (the bad math and feat taxes, etc). Nothing the DMG would resolve.</p> <p style="text-align: left"></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rechan, post: 5764544, member: 54846"] Most of the issues IMO are not with that. Most of the "I don't like 4e" comes from: [LEFT] [LIST] [*]Actions specific to WotC: canceling the print Dragon/Dungeon, the way 4e was previewed/comments by the designers, lack of OGL. The layout of the books (limited fluff, uninteresting reads; the PHB and MM are all numbers no fluff). There were people outraged that the gnome/half-orc were not in PHB1 and Frost Giants weren't in the MM1. [*]Less simulationism, more gamist nature of the system (see the nod to Realism threads). [*]The way the system "Feels" (i.e. videogamey): marking techniques, fighters with "p0werz", the way healing powers work, the "sameness" of classes, etc. [*]Lack of some traditional D&D rules: vancian magic, shift from daily resources to encounter resources, over-emphasis on grid-based minis, lack of non-combat abilities (the Crafting Skill, charm person). [/LIST] While they were working on 4e, they used certain design elements in late 3e books. Complete Mage had feats that allowed an at-will-ike spell ability, there was the Warlock Class who only had At Will powers, the Book of Nine Swords were a 3.5 interpretation of fighter/warlord powers. People complained about those for the video-gamey/non-realistic elements then. Many of the arguments today are the same arguments had when 4e was being previewed. The above elements would have have existed regardless of the DMG's advice. Once an impression was made about 4e, what the DMG [B]actually[/B] said would not matter. And in my experience, people who passionately do not like something will find more things to dislike about the thing they dislike, and positive elements/counterpoints will have [B]no[/B] impact. There's more psychology behind it but I think that's enough. Most of your "I'm having trouble running 4e" issues come from running skill challenges (which more has been written than any other topic), building encounters, and issues with the system itself (the bad math and feat taxes, etc). Nothing the DMG would resolve. [/LEFT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Who's Actually Read the DM's Guides
Top