Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="S'mon" data-source="post: 2418267" data-attributes="member: 463">I think (now I'm sober) fusangite was right and I should not be confusing law and morality.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />&nbsp; I will say though that neither has anything at all to do with Fair Use* doctrine, it's all about the social contract at the game table (or PBEM, or LARP).&nbsp; It's normally the case that the GM is the final arbiter of what that contract is, since he can drop players who disagree with him, but some groups have rotating GMs or a different structure and may have particular ideas about these things.&nbsp; None of these ideas are wrong as long as everyone at the table agrees as to what they are.*Which is rather more extensive than you imply, Danny.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="S'mon, post: 2418267, member: 463"] I think (now I'm sober) fusangite was right and I should not be confusing law and morality. :) I will say though that neither has anything at all to do with Fair Use* doctrine, it's all about the social contract at the game table (or PBEM, or LARP). It's normally the case that the GM is the final arbiter of what that contract is, since he can drop players who disagree with him, but some groups have rotating GMs or a different structure and may have particular ideas about these things. None of these ideas are wrong as long as everyone at the table agrees as to what they are. *Which is rather more extensive than you imply, Danny. [/QUOTE]

Verification