Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why _DON'T_ You Buy Dragon Magazine?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mhacdebhandia" data-source="post: 1891224" data-attributes="member: 18832"><p>A few thoughts, though I do buy the magazine from my FLGS:</p><p></p><p><strong>1.</strong> Articles about the various D&D settings - <em>Planescape</em> in particular - need not be so tied to that setting as to be useless. For example, one of the best ways I can think of to get the attention of <em>Planescape</em> fans would be to publish articles on planar sites with the coolness and flavour of the places detailed in the old products. They can be completely original locations - but if they're flavourful like Balefire, the City of Lanterns (#322), and if they took some of the material in both core and supplemental products and used the site as a way to demonstrate how to use that material in your game, perhaps by quickly sketching the relations between two or three site-appropriate recently-published races, or by presenting an organisation which makes good and significant use of a recent prestige class or two, then <em>Dragon</em> is both promoting recent releases, integrating "crunch" and "fluff", and satisfying those who need ideas of either the mechanical or flavour kinds.</p><p></p><p>Little asides like mentioning one or two factions which might have a presence in the location would bring a smile to the face of fans of <em>Planescape</em> without detracting from its usefulness to Third Edition games. The same principles can be applied to other locations - an article about an interesting location with sidebars or boxes explaining how to adapt it to a Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk, or Eberron campaign (which power groups in the setting might be interested in it, for example) would be good</p><p></p><p>(I realise that some of these things are already done; I suppose my point is that I'd like to see it continue.)</p><p></p><p><strong>2.</strong> Articles about, for example, monster class progressions for several related creatures could probably have the number of monsters covered cut in half, and fill up the rest of the space with a short discussion of what it would be like to roleplay such a being alongside (relatively) normal PCs - how they would be received by regular people, why they might be adventuring, and (again) how they might fit into the various campaign settings. If at all possible I think that shying away from definite statements and instead presenting various options or possibilities for such things might be better - perhaps that ogre adventuring with the paladin might be the object of intense curiosity, rather than of fear or distrust; he is with a paladin, after all.</p><p></p><p><strong>3.</strong> In general I think sidebars or notes adapting generic articles to the various campaign settings both old and new is very important. Even when you don't play in those settings, advice on how to place various things into your game can give homebrewers ideas for how they could do the same.</p><p></p><p><strong>4.</strong> Winning Races is an interesting feature, but it could end up very stale if too many of the races covered end up as anthropomorphised animals. As cool as it is to bring the grippli and lupins back, I'd also like to see more creatures based on myth and folklore like the cyclopeans, or relatively distinctive and original like the illumians. One thing Winning Races should never be is a simple repository of subraces of core races - no elves, no dwarves, no halflings, no gnomes. Finally, and yet again, sidebars on adapting these new creatures to published settings is important.</p><p></p><p><strong>5.</strong> Much as it makes the lists in my signature a little dull, I approve of restricting the number of prestige classes in each issue. I wouldn't, however, be draconian about it - an article on a complete organisation like an evil cult or a knightly order or a magical guild which could be supported by a worthwhile prestige class with flavour and utility shouldn't fall victim to the fact that Gaining Prestige already has an entry lined up for it.</p><p></p><p>On that note, an extra page added to any Gaining Prestige article that fleshes out the flavour of the prestige class presented would be greatly appreciated. Aside from the inevitable request for setting adaption advice, it would also be nice to have a description of one or more organisations (or whatever is appropriate), roleplaying advice, and so on. Prestige classes need more depth, I think, than simply a description of what the class is about, who is likely to take it, and what place they have in an adventuring party. The bowman charger in issue #325 has a little of such information, but the feature could definitely use more.</p><p></p><p><strong>6.</strong> I remember that you said the Class Acts features had something of a dearth of submissions in the beginning, leading to something of a limited range of subjects, but I'll add my voice to those saying that what a druid carries in her backpack is nothing I want to see in the magazine. I really like the idea of the feature, though, and the variety of entries each month is much better than one issue with magic items for each class, the next with flaws for each class, the next with advice on feat and spell selection over 20 levels for each class, and so on. Mixing it up is excellent, but each class should have something genuinely worth reading each month.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mhacdebhandia, post: 1891224, member: 18832"] A few thoughts, though I do buy the magazine from my FLGS: [b]1.[/b] Articles about the various D&D settings - [i]Planescape[/i] in particular - need not be so tied to that setting as to be useless. For example, one of the best ways I can think of to get the attention of [i]Planescape[/i] fans would be to publish articles on planar sites with the coolness and flavour of the places detailed in the old products. They can be completely original locations - but if they're flavourful like Balefire, the City of Lanterns (#322), and if they took some of the material in both core and supplemental products and used the site as a way to demonstrate how to use that material in your game, perhaps by quickly sketching the relations between two or three site-appropriate recently-published races, or by presenting an organisation which makes good and significant use of a recent prestige class or two, then [i]Dragon[/i] is both promoting recent releases, integrating "crunch" and "fluff", and satisfying those who need ideas of either the mechanical or flavour kinds. Little asides like mentioning one or two factions which might have a presence in the location would bring a smile to the face of fans of [i]Planescape[/i] without detracting from its usefulness to Third Edition games. The same principles can be applied to other locations - an article about an interesting location with sidebars or boxes explaining how to adapt it to a Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk, or Eberron campaign (which power groups in the setting might be interested in it, for example) would be good (I realise that some of these things are already done; I suppose my point is that I'd like to see it continue.) [b]2.[/b] Articles about, for example, monster class progressions for several related creatures could probably have the number of monsters covered cut in half, and fill up the rest of the space with a short discussion of what it would be like to roleplay such a being alongside (relatively) normal PCs - how they would be received by regular people, why they might be adventuring, and (again) how they might fit into the various campaign settings. If at all possible I think that shying away from definite statements and instead presenting various options or possibilities for such things might be better - perhaps that ogre adventuring with the paladin might be the object of intense curiosity, rather than of fear or distrust; he is with a paladin, after all. [b]3.[/b] In general I think sidebars or notes adapting generic articles to the various campaign settings both old and new is very important. Even when you don't play in those settings, advice on how to place various things into your game can give homebrewers ideas for how they could do the same. [b]4.[/b] Winning Races is an interesting feature, but it could end up very stale if too many of the races covered end up as anthropomorphised animals. As cool as it is to bring the grippli and lupins back, I'd also like to see more creatures based on myth and folklore like the cyclopeans, or relatively distinctive and original like the illumians. One thing Winning Races should never be is a simple repository of subraces of core races - no elves, no dwarves, no halflings, no gnomes. Finally, and yet again, sidebars on adapting these new creatures to published settings is important. [b]5.[/b] Much as it makes the lists in my signature a little dull, I approve of restricting the number of prestige classes in each issue. I wouldn't, however, be draconian about it - an article on a complete organisation like an evil cult or a knightly order or a magical guild which could be supported by a worthwhile prestige class with flavour and utility shouldn't fall victim to the fact that Gaining Prestige already has an entry lined up for it. On that note, an extra page added to any Gaining Prestige article that fleshes out the flavour of the prestige class presented would be greatly appreciated. Aside from the inevitable request for setting adaption advice, it would also be nice to have a description of one or more organisations (or whatever is appropriate), roleplaying advice, and so on. Prestige classes need more depth, I think, than simply a description of what the class is about, who is likely to take it, and what place they have in an adventuring party. The bowman charger in issue #325 has a little of such information, but the feature could definitely use more. [b]6.[/b] I remember that you said the Class Acts features had something of a dearth of submissions in the beginning, leading to something of a limited range of subjects, but I'll add my voice to those saying that what a druid carries in her backpack is nothing I want to see in the magazine. I really like the idea of the feature, though, and the variety of entries each month is much better than one issue with magic items for each class, the next with flaws for each class, the next with advice on feat and spell selection over 20 levels for each class, and so on. Mixing it up is excellent, but each class should have something genuinely worth reading each month. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why _DON'T_ You Buy Dragon Magazine?
Top