Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why _DON'T_ You Buy Dragon Magazine?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shady" data-source="post: 1924680" data-attributes="member: 13536"><p>Coming late to this thread ... end of year RL pressures have taken me away from ENWorld and at the moment am barely reading past the front page. However I've bookmarked the thread and will try and read through it - I apologise if anything below has been brought up already.</p><p> </p><p> When Dungeon and Dragon were revised I expected to stop buying both. Admittedly I was most upset about the death of Polyhedron, though it was dying a slow death anyhow. I actually think, on a general note, that although I'm not exactly doing cartwheels over everything in the magazines, I think they've both been significantly improved by the revision, and despite patchy distribution I'm picking up both.</p><p> </p><p> I still, and have posted this elsewhere, heartily dislike Silicon Sorcery, and given the choice would can it immediately. A while back there was a thread where Psion expressed a (perfectly legitimate) contrary view - that Silicon Sorcery acted as a conduit for interesting rules twists, given that CRPGs typically implement non-Vance magic systems, for example, and in general implement non-D20 systems more often than not.</p><p> </p><p> I still think such a statement is a stretch, but it subsequently hit me that Wizards has a huge non-d20 seam of material it never mines at all for the purpose of d20 adaptation, specifically MtG. Given that Wizards/Paizo seem perfectly happy to adapt material from properties they don't own (Dungeon Siege, for example), why aren't we seeing adaptations of Mirrodin and Kamagawa? Cross brand contamination issues?</p><p> </p><p> On a similar vein, it would be far more useful to me if, given a choice of stuff to steal/adapt, instead of picking up CRPG stuff, there were monster listings for my considerable collection of Mage Knight minis, or for competing miniature lines like Rackham and Aegyptus. Campaign Magazine (barely) started adapting Mage Knight monsters for d20, with wizkids cooperation so maybe they would be open also.</p><p> </p><p> Anyhow, just a thought/suggestion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shady, post: 1924680, member: 13536"] Coming late to this thread ... end of year RL pressures have taken me away from ENWorld and at the moment am barely reading past the front page. However I've bookmarked the thread and will try and read through it - I apologise if anything below has been brought up already. When Dungeon and Dragon were revised I expected to stop buying both. Admittedly I was most upset about the death of Polyhedron, though it was dying a slow death anyhow. I actually think, on a general note, that although I'm not exactly doing cartwheels over everything in the magazines, I think they've both been significantly improved by the revision, and despite patchy distribution I'm picking up both. I still, and have posted this elsewhere, heartily dislike Silicon Sorcery, and given the choice would can it immediately. A while back there was a thread where Psion expressed a (perfectly legitimate) contrary view - that Silicon Sorcery acted as a conduit for interesting rules twists, given that CRPGs typically implement non-Vance magic systems, for example, and in general implement non-D20 systems more often than not. I still think such a statement is a stretch, but it subsequently hit me that Wizards has a huge non-d20 seam of material it never mines at all for the purpose of d20 adaptation, specifically MtG. Given that Wizards/Paizo seem perfectly happy to adapt material from properties they don't own (Dungeon Siege, for example), why aren't we seeing adaptations of Mirrodin and Kamagawa? Cross brand contamination issues? On a similar vein, it would be far more useful to me if, given a choice of stuff to steal/adapt, instead of picking up CRPG stuff, there were monster listings for my considerable collection of Mage Knight minis, or for competing miniature lines like Rackham and Aegyptus. Campaign Magazine (barely) started adapting Mage Knight monsters for d20, with wizkids cooperation so maybe they would be open also. Anyhow, just a thought/suggestion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why _DON'T_ You Buy Dragon Magazine?
Top