Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why a PETITION: Stop Hasbro's hurtful content is a Bad Idea
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justice and Rule" data-source="post: 8944660" data-attributes="member: 6778210"><p>I mean, I don't really think most do, particularly for stuff this racist. I mean, like [USER=7028372]@Irlo[/USER] mentioned, Harper Collins sells <em>Mein Kampf </em>and gives the proceeds to charity. This is not a historical important piece of work, this is just some racist fantasy stuff a game company sold in the 1980's.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Censored 11 are pretty well-known for their niche industry and even outside; heck, <em>I</em> knew about them. I think cartoons in particular are way more important in this regard because many don't have the massive cultural weight and significance of a <em>Birth of the Nation</em> or a <em>Mein Kampf. </em>The Censored 11 aren't available, though other cartoons that have racist elements <em>are</em>, often with explicit warnings. Some have been modified. I think that's a way better place to start a conversation than trying to compare them to incredibly significant racist works that have volumes of analysis written on them compared to badly written racist caricatures. The value of the work itself should be included in this conversation because it's important in dictating how it is preserved.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I mean, they could donate the money to an appropriate charity, like Harper Collins does with <em>Mein Kampf.</em> That would honestly help a bit with the skeeviness. But also just because people might want it is not exactly the best reason to keep producing a racist work. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I feel like by that logic, the best course of action would be to put nothing on it in the first place, because you could completely undersell how much racist it is anyways. Best to let people decide for themselves, right?</p><p></p><p>If Wizards can't understand and identify the problems with the book, they have much greater problems. Like really, I would trust that Wizards could get someone competent enough to nail most of what is there, and the educational value of putting these warnings and being specific would help people miss the subtle stuff they might not catch amongst the bluntness of the in-your-face stuff.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justice and Rule, post: 8944660, member: 6778210"] I mean, I don't really think most do, particularly for stuff this racist. I mean, like [USER=7028372]@Irlo[/USER] mentioned, Harper Collins sells [I]Mein Kampf [/I]and gives the proceeds to charity. This is not a historical important piece of work, this is just some racist fantasy stuff a game company sold in the 1980's. The Censored 11 are pretty well-known for their niche industry and even outside; heck, [I]I[/I] knew about them. I think cartoons in particular are way more important in this regard because many don't have the massive cultural weight and significance of a [I]Birth of the Nation[/I] or a [I]Mein Kampf. [/I]The Censored 11 aren't available, though other cartoons that have racist elements [I]are[/I], often with explicit warnings. Some have been modified. I think that's a way better place to start a conversation than trying to compare them to incredibly significant racist works that have volumes of analysis written on them compared to badly written racist caricatures. The value of the work itself should be included in this conversation because it's important in dictating how it is preserved. I mean, they could donate the money to an appropriate charity, like Harper Collins does with [I]Mein Kampf.[/I] That would honestly help a bit with the skeeviness. But also just because people might want it is not exactly the best reason to keep producing a racist work. I feel like by that logic, the best course of action would be to put nothing on it in the first place, because you could completely undersell how much racist it is anyways. Best to let people decide for themselves, right? If Wizards can't understand and identify the problems with the book, they have much greater problems. Like really, I would trust that Wizards could get someone competent enough to nail most of what is there, and the educational value of putting these warnings and being specific would help people miss the subtle stuff they might not catch amongst the bluntness of the in-your-face stuff. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why a PETITION: Stop Hasbro's hurtful content is a Bad Idea
Top