Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why a PETITION: Stop Hasbro's hurtful content is a Bad Idea
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LordEntrails" data-source="post: 8945562" data-attributes="member: 6804070"><p>Yes I did. Thanks for reposting it. I will gladly state specific views on each point.</p><p></p><p>Already been done. Does not need to be done again. Doing so in this "special case" is a stupid business decision that opens the company up for risk and any such change to the default disclaimer will be argued as being wrong by at least a minority of vocal people. Just like the current disclaimer keeps be argued about.</p><p></p><p>Maybe. I don't necessarily agree with that specific charity choice, and not sure any charity would be satisfactory to everyone. So who gets to decide? May or may not be a good business decision to attempt to find an ideal solution.</p><p></p><p>The Sigil has explained why in detail. Increasing the distribution of this product is not helpful or beneficial.</p><p></p><p>No. Any such report would be argued about more than just a change in the disclaimer. As Dungeonosophy has already done a great deal of this work, it does not need to be done again. All this would do is to draw attention to a product that does not deserve such attention, even as a lesson of the past.</p><p></p><p>No, this report should not be created in the first place, and would again only cause the product to gain distribution.</p><p></p><p>No. There is not a good cost-benefit to doing this. Those resources would much better be used to create an all new setting. Mystara might be the favorite of the author and others, but it not a major setting that makes sense to re-invision. Dark Sun or Greyhawk would be a much more intelligent candidate to invest such resources in.</p><p></p><p>Irrelevant. GAZ10 is so troublesome it's not worth being revisited in whole even if ported to another setting. Those few aspects that are valuable are simple ideas that could be incorporated in a totally new product. </p><p></p><p>No. This report should not be created by WotC, this product should not be enhanced and sales of it should not be encouraged.</p><p></p><p>Simple, updating any D&D product will draw tens of thousand or hundreds of thousands of eyes to it. It will spread this horrible product, not letting is die in obscurity like it should.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LordEntrails, post: 8945562, member: 6804070"] Yes I did. Thanks for reposting it. I will gladly state specific views on each point. Already been done. Does not need to be done again. Doing so in this "special case" is a stupid business decision that opens the company up for risk and any such change to the default disclaimer will be argued as being wrong by at least a minority of vocal people. Just like the current disclaimer keeps be argued about. Maybe. I don't necessarily agree with that specific charity choice, and not sure any charity would be satisfactory to everyone. So who gets to decide? May or may not be a good business decision to attempt to find an ideal solution. The Sigil has explained why in detail. Increasing the distribution of this product is not helpful or beneficial. No. Any such report would be argued about more than just a change in the disclaimer. As Dungeonosophy has already done a great deal of this work, it does not need to be done again. All this would do is to draw attention to a product that does not deserve such attention, even as a lesson of the past. No, this report should not be created in the first place, and would again only cause the product to gain distribution. No. There is not a good cost-benefit to doing this. Those resources would much better be used to create an all new setting. Mystara might be the favorite of the author and others, but it not a major setting that makes sense to re-invision. Dark Sun or Greyhawk would be a much more intelligent candidate to invest such resources in. Irrelevant. GAZ10 is so troublesome it's not worth being revisited in whole even if ported to another setting. Those few aspects that are valuable are simple ideas that could be incorporated in a totally new product. No. This report should not be created by WotC, this product should not be enhanced and sales of it should not be encouraged. Simple, updating any D&D product will draw tens of thousand or hundreds of thousands of eyes to it. It will spread this horrible product, not letting is die in obscurity like it should. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why a PETITION: Stop Hasbro's hurtful content is a Bad Idea
Top