Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LordEntrails" data-source="post: 8945712" data-attributes="member: 6804070">No, it's not meant to discount all actions. It's intended to point out that action has already been taken, and that action is adequate and further action would, imo, have detrimental impacts.If it were a teaching tool he would be looking to have it published in academic journals, not on a gaming product site.I was. Because I could not disagree with the premise.Look at my first post there, last I looked it had about 40 likes. I've never seen a post get anywhere near 40 likes (I'm sure others have, but I just haven't noticed them). For this forum, that's a sh!t-ton. Look at all the participation in this thread. If it hasn't already, it looks like it will soon surpass the number of posts in the original thread. It's the same topic, why is this thread so much more active then? Because the labelling of the other post as a + thread has simple shut down discussion of the topic and driven it here.Notice how [USER=6688049]@Dungeonosophy[/USER] has not participated in this thread? Why is that? It speaks volumes to me about his intentions with his petition. But I would love to know what his real intentions are, but only he can clarify that and speak for himself. Which he so far has chosen not to do.</blockquote>