Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why a PETITION: Stop Hasbro's hurtful content is a Bad Idea
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justice and Rule" data-source="post: 8945727" data-attributes="member: 6778210"><p>And you've not really shown any sort of "detrimental impact" besides speculate that maybe there could be further outrage or that Hasbro would throw a tantrum and toss their ball away.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You can have teaching tools that are not just published on academic journals, especially when it comes to your own product.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're right, you disagreed with the premise and even misstated what they were saying by saying they were trying to sweep the past under the rug, which is really funny given that most of your responses to their points were to not give it any more exposure. And then you also stated they were going to rewrite history, which they also said they weren't. So I mean, maybe people just get a lot of likes from saying what people want to hear even if it's not exactly accurate.</p><p></p><p>I mean, I dunno, I try not to judge myself on how many likes I get. Feels weird.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Maybe they feel like a person who actively got 40+ likes while saying they were trying to do things they weren't wasn't a good use of their time? Honestly, I think it says a lot more that you felt the need to create an entirely separate thread to talk about it. I've never so incensed about leaving a thread that I had to create a whole new one to oppose it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't believe I've actually said that this thread shouldn't exist, so that's wrong. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>But also having this fight in that thread would make it so that the original topic of that thread never gets discussed. The whole <em>point </em>of this thread is to discuss whether or not <em>that </em>thread should exist, which I'm engaging with. I don't think the original post wanted such a weird, tautological discussion as to whether the thread they should started should exist at all, but rather wanted to discuss a different topic that people posted saying "I don't think we should discuss this topic!"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think the idea is to actively confront these old tropes and use Hasbro to educate people on racism with their old product instead of just selling it with a boilerplate warning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justice and Rule, post: 8945727, member: 6778210"] And you've not really shown any sort of "detrimental impact" besides speculate that maybe there could be further outrage or that Hasbro would throw a tantrum and toss their ball away. You can have teaching tools that are not just published on academic journals, especially when it comes to your own product. You're right, you disagreed with the premise and even misstated what they were saying by saying they were trying to sweep the past under the rug, which is really funny given that most of your responses to their points were to not give it any more exposure. And then you also stated they were going to rewrite history, which they also said they weren't. So I mean, maybe people just get a lot of likes from saying what people want to hear even if it's not exactly accurate. I mean, I dunno, I try not to judge myself on how many likes I get. Feels weird. Maybe they feel like a person who actively got 40+ likes while saying they were trying to do things they weren't wasn't a good use of their time? Honestly, I think it says a lot more that you felt the need to create an entirely separate thread to talk about it. I've never so incensed about leaving a thread that I had to create a whole new one to oppose it. ;) I don't believe I've actually said that this thread shouldn't exist, so that's wrong. :p But also having this fight in that thread would make it so that the original topic of that thread never gets discussed. The whole [I]point [/I]of this thread is to discuss whether or not [I]that [/I]thread should exist, which I'm engaging with. I don't think the original post wanted such a weird, tautological discussion as to whether the thread they should started should exist at all, but rather wanted to discuss a different topic that people posted saying "I don't think we should discuss this topic!" I think the idea is to actively confront these old tropes and use Hasbro to educate people on racism with their old product instead of just selling it with a boilerplate warning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why a PETITION: Stop Hasbro's hurtful content is a Bad Idea
Top