Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sckeener" data-source="post: 3445755" data-attributes="member: 8801">And people are still upset about those changes.  There's a lot of baggage about Hell.  Orcus probably hasn't been done in Demonomicon article because of the baggage he brings.  I'm sure he will be done, but there is a lot more work involved in writing up an Orcus article than say an Kostchtchie article.Nothing is stopping DMs from using Hell.   I convert all adventures to my world already.  I pretty much rewrite the adventures into a word document...so simple name switches are easy...find/replace.I just think it is harder to balance the cannon of the Hells than the Abyss.  Paizo and WotC risk more when introducing new elements into Hell than they do with the Abyss.As a DM I have no problem with making changes to hell....however if I do make a change and later WotC goes a different direction then I am going to forever be mucking about with cannon vs my world.  WotC and Paizo should be bring out stuff that will work in most settings...there's room for growth in the Abyss....heck there is room for growth in most of the planes...but they have to be careful not to offend the base.  I feel for Robin and Robert.  They had a hard time trying to merge the past cannon.  Their version is ok and better than I expected; however I'm not happy with FC2.</blockquote>