Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Why all the Fuss over the One Ring?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gizzard" data-source="post: 752984" data-attributes="member: 527"><p>Tangentially, I am curious if Alzrius' question comes after reading the book or seeing the movie. The characterization of the One Ring is a bit different in each. In the book, I think its clearer what exactly the Ring is all about. I think its easier to miss some of the subtleties in the movie. For instance:</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Boromir says in the Council that "This Ring is a great gift. Let us take it and use it against our enemy." Galadriel gives her "Dark Queen" speech. But other than that, I dont think the movie really addresses the issue of exactly how powerful the Ring could be. (Not that I'd expect 2/3s of the movie trilogy to be as deep as 3 thick books.)</p><p></p><p>Also, in the movie, the Ring is a much more immediately corrupting influence, so proportionally, there seems to be more "fuss" over it. Ie, everyone is strongly and immediately affected. In the movie, only Aragorn and Gandalf have successfully withstood the test of the ring; while in the book it is closer to say that only Boromir and Saruman had failed.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I thought more that it grants anyone a huge amount of power, but can only tempt them with visions of how <em>they personally</em> might use that power. So Boromir sees using the Ring to turn the tide of the war he is losing. Sam sees becoming a great gardener; but this would be gardening on an unimaginable scale.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I always thought of the hobbits as being more immune to the temptations of the Ring because they are generally happy and sheltered from the cares of Middle Earth. The Ring has to start small with them; offering visions of gardens and food and maybe Lobelia stuffed in a wood-chipper. In a similar way, the Ring had to abandon poor Gollum, because it couldnt find a way to shake him out of his exile under the mountain. It could offer him dreams of power, but Gollum's world had become so small that he didnt need anything other than a handful of fish and the Precious.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gizzard, post: 752984, member: 527"] Tangentially, I am curious if Alzrius' question comes after reading the book or seeing the movie. The characterization of the One Ring is a bit different in each. In the book, I think its clearer what exactly the Ring is all about. I think its easier to miss some of the subtleties in the movie. For instance: Boromir says in the Council that "This Ring is a great gift. Let us take it and use it against our enemy." Galadriel gives her "Dark Queen" speech. But other than that, I dont think the movie really addresses the issue of exactly how powerful the Ring could be. (Not that I'd expect 2/3s of the movie trilogy to be as deep as 3 thick books.) Also, in the movie, the Ring is a much more immediately corrupting influence, so proportionally, there seems to be more "fuss" over it. Ie, everyone is strongly and immediately affected. In the movie, only Aragorn and Gandalf have successfully withstood the test of the ring; while in the book it is closer to say that only Boromir and Saruman had failed. I thought more that it grants anyone a huge amount of power, but can only tempt them with visions of how [I]they personally[/I] might use that power. So Boromir sees using the Ring to turn the tide of the war he is losing. Sam sees becoming a great gardener; but this would be gardening on an unimaginable scale. Anyway, I always thought of the hobbits as being more immune to the temptations of the Ring because they are generally happy and sheltered from the cares of Middle Earth. The Ring has to start small with them; offering visions of gardens and food and maybe Lobelia stuffed in a wood-chipper. In a similar way, the Ring had to abandon poor Gollum, because it couldnt find a way to shake him out of his exile under the mountain. It could offer him dreams of power, but Gollum's world had become so small that he didnt need anything other than a handful of fish and the Precious. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Why all the Fuss over the One Ring?
Top