Why are pixies so large?

Thanee

First Post
Shouldn't they be tiny? :)

Most faeries/pixies are depicted a lot smaller, heck, even on the picture in the MM (compared to the nixie), the pixie looks a lot smaller than, well, small.

What do you think about their small size?

Bye
Thanee
 

log in or register to remove this ad


(as should gnomes)

and dwarfs!!

4000100.jpg
 


They (as in the pic above) are called "Garden Gnomes" out in my neck o' the woods. Though I have always noticed how much those things, as they are designed, look like Snow White's posse.

I hate Disney.

So very, very much.
 

Ok.. Pixies hmm....

*precosious-fairy-teachers-lore-mode-activated*

Striktly speaking, a Pixie or Pixy is a Devonshire fairy, more or less the same as Puck.
Alternate spellings, dialects and variants of Puck include Pisca, Poake, Pouk, Pouke, Pucke, Puckle, Pug, Púka, Pukis, Pukje, Pwca and many more. The Irish pooka, or púca, and the Welsh pwcca usually refer to similar spirits.

Since the thing is basically an Irish myth, exact pronunciation is hard to come by. In the end Puck & Pixie go down to the same myth (even though modern interpretations of the two don't have much in common).

Either way, the Puck (Pixie) is an extremely mischievous nature or household fairy in English/Irish lore. It's mostly known for playing spiteful tricks on unsuspecting humans, which leads to often embarrassing situations, but in some cases its been known to champion the poor and oppressed.

Favorite tricks include: changing shapes, misleading travelers at night, spoiling milk, frightening young girls, and tripping venerable old dames.

Descriptions of him range from a hobgoblin to a fairy, brownie, goblin, an elf or a thing more or less that of our beloved D&D Pixie.
A Puck (Pixie) can, as has been said, shapeshift and some say that this is a confirmation of his tricky personality, often associated with shape shifting abilities.

Most people, though, think of him as having a hairy body, with goat feet, like a satyr or faun, since that way he was portrait in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream and in Kipling's Puck of Pooks Hill. Far and wide the most loved and renowned versions.

D&D (or some earlier game/novel??) has made the Pixie an altogether different beast I assume, but the original Puck (Pixie) would IMO likely be small (in D&D terms), about the size of a human child.
 
Last edited:

I agree, pixies ought to be tiny (or even diminutive, i.e. under a foot), but they have always been 2½ ft in D&D (at least from the first MM).

Pixies in fairy tales, at least the ones I'm thinking of, are small enough to hide beneath mushrooms and might be born from flower buds! Not hulking 2½ ft monsters ;)
Or are these just pixies in scandinavian tales?
 



Well I can see Pixies as Both small and Tiny creatures depending on how you classify them. As D&D currently has them, I would say they are small (obviously), because they are a "race". But if you were going to make them a Species, then there could be different sizes.

Got off on a related topic (Biological Tree) so started another post.

In thinking about what common people (non-d&d gamers) think, ask then what Tinkerbell is ? Is she a Faerie? or a Pixie. I think you would get both from most people? So if we use what common people think of a Pixie then Tiny would probably be more appropriate.
 

Remove ads

Top