Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why are single target powers stated as Close Burst?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Merkuri" data-source="post: 5406652" data-attributes="member: 41321"><p>When I first came across a power worded like this, I was confused for probably all of 30 seconds. I realized almost immediately that Close powers don't provoke, and I thought, "Oh, that's a neat way to make a ranged attack that doesn't provoke!"</p><p></p><p>Regarding making everything clear within the power and not having to reference other rules and keywords, that would make some really wordy powers. Would you imagine having to write out the meaning of status effects, like Dazed, each time a power references one? Sure, in a perfect world you'd like to be able to make each power understandable on its own, but that's just not a good use of space. </p><p></p><p>Also, for powers that work similarly you'll end up having a ton of text that's identical between the two, and you'll have to painstakingly scan through the two powers to find out what's different between them. Finding the little bit of text in the large paragraph that says "Does not provoke" may take you longer than looking up what a Close Burst attack is and what makes it different from a Ranged attack. (Plus, once you look that up once, odds are you will remember it for next time and not need to look it up again.)</p><p></p><p>The fact of the matter is, although we're not computers, our brains are incredibly powerful. We have good memories and logic centers, and we're able to remember that a Close power has an area of effect, an origin square in your space, and doesn't provoke. And if you don't remember it, you probably know how to look it up in the PHB or the Compendium. </p><p></p><p>Also, the more you use this information the more likely you are to remember it, so players with a small amount of powers are pretty likely to remember how they work after they've used those powers in a few battles. Without looking anything up, I know as an Invoker in my Monday night game that Sun Strike is a Ranged 10 attack and I will get hit if I try to use it when an ogre with a club is standing next to me. I also know that Astral Wind is a better choice in that situation, because not only will it push the ogre away from me, but the ogre doesn't get to hit me for using it.</p><p></p><p>But if I go for a few months without playing that Invoker and my knowledge of Sun Strike and Astral Wind gets rusty, I can read "Ranged 10" and "Close Blast 3" and know immediately which of those powers is good to use when there's a goblin standing next to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Merkuri, post: 5406652, member: 41321"] When I first came across a power worded like this, I was confused for probably all of 30 seconds. I realized almost immediately that Close powers don't provoke, and I thought, "Oh, that's a neat way to make a ranged attack that doesn't provoke!" Regarding making everything clear within the power and not having to reference other rules and keywords, that would make some really wordy powers. Would you imagine having to write out the meaning of status effects, like Dazed, each time a power references one? Sure, in a perfect world you'd like to be able to make each power understandable on its own, but that's just not a good use of space. Also, for powers that work similarly you'll end up having a ton of text that's identical between the two, and you'll have to painstakingly scan through the two powers to find out what's different between them. Finding the little bit of text in the large paragraph that says "Does not provoke" may take you longer than looking up what a Close Burst attack is and what makes it different from a Ranged attack. (Plus, once you look that up once, odds are you will remember it for next time and not need to look it up again.) The fact of the matter is, although we're not computers, our brains are incredibly powerful. We have good memories and logic centers, and we're able to remember that a Close power has an area of effect, an origin square in your space, and doesn't provoke. And if you don't remember it, you probably know how to look it up in the PHB or the Compendium. Also, the more you use this information the more likely you are to remember it, so players with a small amount of powers are pretty likely to remember how they work after they've used those powers in a few battles. Without looking anything up, I know as an Invoker in my Monday night game that Sun Strike is a Ranged 10 attack and I will get hit if I try to use it when an ogre with a club is standing next to me. I also know that Astral Wind is a better choice in that situation, because not only will it push the ogre away from me, but the ogre doesn't get to hit me for using it. But if I go for a few months without playing that Invoker and my knowledge of Sun Strike and Astral Wind gets rusty, I can read "Ranged 10" and "Close Blast 3" and know immediately which of those powers is good to use when there's a goblin standing next to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why are single target powers stated as Close Burst?
Top