Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why are vague rules praised?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6453081" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>I think the problem here is that [MENTION=2518]Derren[/MENTION]'s use of the word vague is, well, rather vague. Because, the way I see it, there are two ways a rule can be vague:</p><p></p><p>1. The rule is unclear in some way and two people, looking at the same rule can come up with radically different interpretations. Alignment rules often look like this where two people can not only have differing opinions, but, can hold mutually exclusive opinions and still support their interpretation through the rules. </p><p></p><p>2. The rule leaves a lot of room for interpreting the final results or lack a great deal of granularity. The Carousing rules in 5e look like this. The rules are fairly clear in what happens, but, are very open ended and leave a lot to the individual table for implementation.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I have no real problem with the second type of vague. It's simply a quick and dirty system that gets the job done. You carouse, and stuff happens. If the DM wants to actually drill down and get more detailed, then go right ahead, there's nothing in the rules to stop you. OTOH, for those of us who don't care, a simple table does the trick. We can make stuff up on the fly if needed or just go with the results. </p><p></p><p>The first type of vague, I strongly dislike, and I think that it's poor game design.</p><p></p><p>But, [MENTION=2518]Derren[/MENTION], my point above still stands. After years of 4e critics constantly kvetching and bitching about how WOTC was trying to tell people how to play the game, if they do what you want them to do, they will ALWAYS do it wrong (for someone anyway) and we'll have years more of constant bitching about it. Far, far better to step back, tell DM's that this sort of thing is their responsibility. Pass the buck back to the DM's because, based on years of criticism from loud, constant, and never ending 4e critics, it's not worth trying to get more detailed.</p><p></p><p>IOW, you are getting vague rules like this because that's what some very vocal people asked for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 6453081, member: 22779"] I think the problem here is that [MENTION=2518]Derren[/MENTION]'s use of the word vague is, well, rather vague. Because, the way I see it, there are two ways a rule can be vague: 1. The rule is unclear in some way and two people, looking at the same rule can come up with radically different interpretations. Alignment rules often look like this where two people can not only have differing opinions, but, can hold mutually exclusive opinions and still support their interpretation through the rules. 2. The rule leaves a lot of room for interpreting the final results or lack a great deal of granularity. The Carousing rules in 5e look like this. The rules are fairly clear in what happens, but, are very open ended and leave a lot to the individual table for implementation. Personally, I have no real problem with the second type of vague. It's simply a quick and dirty system that gets the job done. You carouse, and stuff happens. If the DM wants to actually drill down and get more detailed, then go right ahead, there's nothing in the rules to stop you. OTOH, for those of us who don't care, a simple table does the trick. We can make stuff up on the fly if needed or just go with the results. The first type of vague, I strongly dislike, and I think that it's poor game design. But, [MENTION=2518]Derren[/MENTION], my point above still stands. After years of 4e critics constantly kvetching and bitching about how WOTC was trying to tell people how to play the game, if they do what you want them to do, they will ALWAYS do it wrong (for someone anyway) and we'll have years more of constant bitching about it. Far, far better to step back, tell DM's that this sort of thing is their responsibility. Pass the buck back to the DM's because, based on years of criticism from loud, constant, and never ending 4e critics, it's not worth trying to get more detailed. IOW, you are getting vague rules like this because that's what some very vocal people asked for. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why are vague rules praised?
Top