Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why are vague rules praised?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Crimson Binome" data-source="post: 7793281" data-attributes="member: 6775031"><p>I wouldn't necessarily agree with that, but I will say that vague rules can often make for a better simulation than concrete ones.</p><p></p><p>Using stealth as an example, the existing rules are that the DM tells you whether it's possible to hide, based on all the factors they understand about the scenario. If we wanted to model that with concrete rules, we'd have to introduce things like facing (which would be a pain); and even if we did implement facing (in four or six directions), no amount of granularity would ever encompass all of the relevant factors to the same degree as the DM's adjudication.</p><p></p><p>A big problem with a lot of highly-granular systems is that they introduce rules which cause worse problems than the ones they solve. TV Tropes refers to this as "Misaimed Realism", and gives an example of Opportunity Attacks in 3E. It makes sense that you can't just run past someone with a sword who wants to stop you, but over-codification of the rules ended up with the famous Bag of Rats. If the burden was instead on the DM, to adjudicate whether or not an opportunity attack was appropriate at the moment, then that never would have happened.</p><p></p><p>Edit: Argh. I just noticed that I was responding to a post from five years ago. I kinda wish that these threads could be color-coded by year :-/</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Crimson Binome, post: 7793281, member: 6775031"] I wouldn't necessarily agree with that, but I will say that vague rules can often make for a better simulation than concrete ones. Using stealth as an example, the existing rules are that the DM tells you whether it's possible to hide, based on all the factors they understand about the scenario. If we wanted to model that with concrete rules, we'd have to introduce things like facing (which would be a pain); and even if we did implement facing (in four or six directions), no amount of granularity would ever encompass all of the relevant factors to the same degree as the DM's adjudication. A big problem with a lot of highly-granular systems is that they introduce rules which cause worse problems than the ones they solve. TV Tropes refers to this as "Misaimed Realism", and gives an example of Opportunity Attacks in 3E. It makes sense that you can't just run past someone with a sword who wants to stop you, but over-codification of the rules ended up with the famous Bag of Rats. If the burden was instead on the DM, to adjudicate whether or not an opportunity attack was appropriate at the moment, then that never would have happened. Edit: Argh. I just noticed that I was responding to a post from five years ago. I kinda wish that these threads could be color-coded by year :-/ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why are vague rules praised?
Top