Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Grizpapa" data-source="post: 1535160" data-attributes="member: 12583">Kahuna Burger defines &quot;arrogence&quot;&nbsp;FYI #1: It's &quot;it's&quot; and not its.Actually, it was pretty accurate in terms of the thread up to that point. I will admit it was slightly more charged then I would have liked but I had had enough at that point and felt the need to post something. While I did originally intend to follow my post up with further explanation, I never got around to it as I had to leave to go on vacation.Unfortunately, this thread has quickly gotten out of hand and I doubt I'll have enough time to spend to catch up after page five.Which time and again have been proven in this very thread. Maybe it's just &quot;your poor attempt&quot; to read the other posts or to even grasp what the other people in the thread are writing. FYI #2: It's &quot;arrogance&quot; and &quot;Explanation&quot; not &quot;arrogence&quot; and &quot;Explaination&quot;.While I did include a quote from your, aren't your the one being arrogant in assuming that the whole post was directed at you. Why yes, yes you are.As far as you not reading the rest of the post, I could careless as long as someone else with a dissenting opinion read it.So in summation: You have proven that you did not bother to read the entire thread up to that point or you would have realized that the &quot;you&quot; was plural and not singular.As such you have also proven that you and not I are the &quot;arrogent&quot; one but I already had that impression from other posts you've made on these boards.You have also proven that you are &quot;misinformed&quot; when it comes to using &quot;basic&quot; spelling and &quot;basic&quot; grammer.I have proven that I should have stated in plain English that the post was directed at not just you but to also the others with low opinions of paladins.I have also proven that I am wasting my time dealing with someone who is beneath me, especially at this late hour.With that I bid you good day.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Grizpapa, post: 1535160, member: 12583"] [b]Kahuna Burger defines "arrogence"[/b] FYI #1: It's "it's" and not its. Actually, it was pretty accurate in terms of the thread up to that point. I will admit it was slightly more charged then I would have liked but I had had enough at that point and felt the need to post something. While I did originally intend to follow my post up with further explanation, I never got around to it as I had to leave to go on vacation. Unfortunately, this thread has quickly gotten out of hand and I doubt I'll have enough time to spend to catch up after page five. Which time and again have been proven in this very thread. Maybe it's just "your poor attempt" to read the other posts or to even grasp what the other people in the thread are writing. FYI #2: It's "arrogance" and "Explanation" not "arrogence" and "Explaination". While I did include a quote from your, aren't your the one being arrogant in assuming that the whole post was directed at you. Why yes, yes you are. As far as you not reading the rest of the post, I could careless as long as someone else with a dissenting opinion read it. So in summation: You have proven that you did not bother to read the entire thread up to that point or you would have realized that the "you" was plural and not singular. As such you have also proven that you and not I are the "arrogent" one but I already had that impression from other posts you've made on these boards. You have also proven that you are "misinformed" when it comes to using "basic" spelling and "basic" grammer. I have proven that I should have stated in plain English that the post was directed at not just you but to also the others with low opinions of paladins. I have also proven that I am wasting my time dealing with someone who is beneath me, especially at this late hour. With that I bid you good day. [/QUOTE]

Verification