Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Arnwyn" data-source="post: 2633918" data-attributes="member: 7701">This would be very much appreciated. As I'm sure you're well aware, one can't make a vote for change unless one has adequate information.As noted by Conaill above, a list of which judge voted for what product to be nominated from the many submissions in the Ennies would also be very appreciated - again, to give the voter adequate and proper information, and possibly reduce any apathy for future Ennie judge voting.See above. Might you consider forcing anyone running for an Ennie judge to give better and more detailed information in their &quot;campaign speech&quot; (as opposed to relying on the off chance that one might &quot;know&quot; that poster and his/her likes and dislikes from hanging around the boards for a good long while)?People don't take the effort to vote when there is little (read: no) information. Your &quot;gotten goat&quot; seems a little misplaced.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Arnwyn, post: 2633918, member: 7701"] This would be very much appreciated. As I'm sure you're well aware, one can't make a vote for change unless one has adequate information. As noted by Conaill above, a list of which judge voted for what product to be nominated from the many submissions in the Ennies would also be very appreciated - again, to give the voter adequate and proper information, and possibly reduce any apathy for future Ennie judge voting. See above. Might you consider forcing anyone running for an Ennie judge to give better and more detailed information in their "campaign speech" (as opposed to relying on the off chance that one might "know" that poster and his/her likes and dislikes from hanging around the boards for a good long while)? People don't take the effort to vote when there is little (read: no) information. Your "gotten goat" seems a little misplaced. [/QUOTE]

Verification