Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Borthos" data-source="post: 5364462" data-attributes="member: 93344">How are other classes (prepared spellcasters and divine spellcasters barred) not one trick ponies as well?&nbsp; Barbarian can rage, Ranger can track and deal with animals, and a monk beats stuff down with his fists.&nbsp;&nbsp; So if a player wants to play a barbarian because of the midgame trapsense he gains in addition to being able to rage.&nbsp; your logic says why not just be a rogue and be able to spot traps better?&nbsp; Because that person wants to be able to rage. So he&nbsp; plays a barbarian. Fighters can do anything a ranger can do in combat. anything a monk can do in combat, a fighter can do. maybe not deal the same unarmed, but, wait for it, there are feats for that! holy cow! who woulda thunk it.&nbsp; Sometimes you don't want a monk, you want a back alley bar fighter. so play a human fighter with superior unarmed strike, throw anything, and improved improvised weapon, and go from there.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Borthos, post: 5364462, member: 93344"] How are other classes (prepared spellcasters and divine spellcasters barred) not one trick ponies as well? Barbarian can rage, Ranger can track and deal with animals, and a monk beats stuff down with his fists. So if a player wants to play a barbarian because of the midgame trapsense he gains in addition to being able to rage. your logic says why not just be a rogue and be able to spot traps better? Because that person wants to be able to rage. So he plays a barbarian. Fighters can do anything a ranger can do in combat. anything a monk can do in combat, a fighter can do. maybe not deal the same unarmed, but, wait for it, there are feats for that! holy cow! who woulda thunk it. Sometimes you don't want a monk, you want a back alley bar fighter. so play a human fighter with superior unarmed strike, throw anything, and improved improvised weapon, and go from there. [/QUOTE]

Verification