Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why can’t I find anything wrong with 5e?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6971776" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>For me it is as simple as "Playing RAW is not inherently better than not playing RAW, so there's no reason not to make adjustments to the game to better the experience."</p><p></p><p>I give my players little boons all the time (for any number of different reasons, none of which might be in the rules to do.) I will merge subclasses together for players if it comes out of how their characters are played. I will expand on monster abilities if they aren't doing a job I'd like them to do. I will change the mechanics of certain subsystems in different campaigns if they aid in setting up the essence of the new campaign. If my style of table makes certain subsystems either work too well or not well enough, I'll tinker to get the game to a better spot.</p><p></p><p>And there's nothing wrong with any of that. No one gets any award for "playing by RAW", just like there's no award for "playing by RAI" or "rules, not rulings" or "rulings, not rules"... so questioning why you do or do not do any of it is absolutely pointless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6971776, member: 7006"] For me it is as simple as "Playing RAW is not inherently better than not playing RAW, so there's no reason not to make adjustments to the game to better the experience." I give my players little boons all the time (for any number of different reasons, none of which might be in the rules to do.) I will merge subclasses together for players if it comes out of how their characters are played. I will expand on monster abilities if they aren't doing a job I'd like them to do. I will change the mechanics of certain subsystems in different campaigns if they aid in setting up the essence of the new campaign. If my style of table makes certain subsystems either work too well or not well enough, I'll tinker to get the game to a better spot. And there's nothing wrong with any of that. No one gets any award for "playing by RAW", just like there's no award for "playing by RAI" or "rules, not rulings" or "rulings, not rules"... so questioning why you do or do not do any of it is absolutely pointless. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why can’t I find anything wrong with 5e?
Top