Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="buzz" data-source="post: 2264202" data-attributes="member: 6777">But your perspective isn't really the issue. The point is that no one edition of GW had more than 2-4 modules produced in its entire lifespan.And, if five modules in a year is more than sufficient, I don't why you're even arguing your point. There were probably 100 modules produced for 3e in just its first year! From your perspective, there are more modules available right now for your D&D game than you could play in a lifetime, and out of those hundreds, I'm more than confident you can find five good ones to run each year for the next decade.The basis for this whole thread is just nostalgia. People complaining about how there are no "classic adventures" being produced any more, how WotC are evil capitalists, how 3e is killing itself...3e is the most enjoyable version of D&D I've played yet. There are more good products out there than I could use in a lifetime. The gaming life is *good*. 10-20 years from now, you'll all figure that out, too. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>