Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why Did The Game Wimp Out On Monks?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 5706776" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>Bonus AC for monk levels make up for loss of shield. They can wear <em>bracers of armor</em> and max out dex. If they're made viable as fighters, they don't need as much armor class.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Great 4th member. Trapfinding isn't needed the majority of the time. We often forego rogues since no one likes to play them. Players enjoy the monk.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How does the paladin in your campaign have a much better AC? You building your monk wrong? Or are you under-valuing touch AC?</p><p></p><p>And now you want yet another class's abilities. So because the paladin, a warrior built for defense, has equal saves to a monk that somehow makes the great saves the monk gets not as valuable? You're losing me because monk and paladin are the two big save classes. </p><p></p><p>Paladin doesn't have the movement or the evasion abilities to make the high save as effective. Or all the other nifty little abilities.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The MAD is the only thing I see making them weak. They have great survivability and do fairly good damage once they have a solid magic item tree.</p><p></p><p>2d10 damage with 7 to 9 attacks is nothing to scoff at. My friend usually takes +3 or 4 <em>amulet of mighty fists</em> and an enhancement of some kind such as holy or energy. Ups his damage substantially. He picks his targets well. He positions well to get him bonuses to hit.</p><p></p><p>And if you want a monk that can move, the new <em>Dimensional Agility</em> feat chain answered your wish. So Paizo gave you a nice bone to take advantage of monk movement.</p><p></p><p>I have on player that plays a monk every single campaign in both 3E and <em>Pathfinder</em>. He's trying a ninja this time because he wants to see how it works. But in every other campaign he plays a monk. He loves monks. He loves their versatility. He loves their movement. He loves not having any weak saves. He loves their damage output when he uses a key point and gets a large number of attacks. He loves that all his attacks use full Power Attack, so when he gets buffed with <em>bless</em> and <em>prayer</em> he's smashing for good damage. He loves having maxed out Perception, Sense Motive, and being able to Stealth. </p><p></p><p>I'm wondering why my player finds way to take advantate of the varied abilities of the monk to make the character a very powerful contributing party member, but your groups can't seem to find ways to take advantage of the monk.</p><p></p><p>Monks fast movement makes them awsome scouts. Monks great saves often have them resist aura attacks, spells, area of effect attacks, and the like. Monks high touch AC makes them poor targets for many dangerous abilities like <em>enervate</em> and the like. Monks <em>Abundant Step</em> allows them to escape from behind walls, out of pits, from trapped rooms, away from enemies that try to trap them, and the like. I've seen so much clever play from monk players that other classes can't do that I never understand threads like this.</p><p></p><p>I really can't help but think no one plays monks in your guy's campaigns, so you've never really seen high level monks in action. Whereas I see them in action almost every campaign. They are always a huge pain in my behind as a fourth character. Far moreso than any rogue could ever hope to be.</p><p></p><p>And the only thing we don't do that other groups do is use 15 point point buy. So MAD isn't a factor. When you're not dealing with MAD, monks are very fun and potent to play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 5706776, member: 5834"] Bonus AC for monk levels make up for loss of shield. They can wear [i]bracers of armor[/i] and max out dex. If they're made viable as fighters, they don't need as much armor class. Great 4th member. Trapfinding isn't needed the majority of the time. We often forego rogues since no one likes to play them. Players enjoy the monk. How does the paladin in your campaign have a much better AC? You building your monk wrong? Or are you under-valuing touch AC? And now you want yet another class's abilities. So because the paladin, a warrior built for defense, has equal saves to a monk that somehow makes the great saves the monk gets not as valuable? You're losing me because monk and paladin are the two big save classes. Paladin doesn't have the movement or the evasion abilities to make the high save as effective. Or all the other nifty little abilities. The MAD is the only thing I see making them weak. They have great survivability and do fairly good damage once they have a solid magic item tree. 2d10 damage with 7 to 9 attacks is nothing to scoff at. My friend usually takes +3 or 4 [i]amulet of mighty fists[/i] and an enhancement of some kind such as holy or energy. Ups his damage substantially. He picks his targets well. He positions well to get him bonuses to hit. And if you want a monk that can move, the new [i]Dimensional Agility[/i] feat chain answered your wish. So Paizo gave you a nice bone to take advantage of monk movement. I have on player that plays a monk every single campaign in both 3E and [i]Pathfinder[/i]. He's trying a ninja this time because he wants to see how it works. But in every other campaign he plays a monk. He loves monks. He loves their versatility. He loves their movement. He loves not having any weak saves. He loves their damage output when he uses a key point and gets a large number of attacks. He loves that all his attacks use full Power Attack, so when he gets buffed with [i]bless[/i] and [i]prayer[/i] he's smashing for good damage. He loves having maxed out Perception, Sense Motive, and being able to Stealth. I'm wondering why my player finds way to take advantate of the varied abilities of the monk to make the character a very powerful contributing party member, but your groups can't seem to find ways to take advantage of the monk. Monks fast movement makes them awsome scouts. Monks great saves often have them resist aura attacks, spells, area of effect attacks, and the like. Monks high touch AC makes them poor targets for many dangerous abilities like [i]enervate[/i] and the like. Monks [i]Abundant Step[/i] allows them to escape from behind walls, out of pits, from trapped rooms, away from enemies that try to trap them, and the like. I've seen so much clever play from monk players that other classes can't do that I never understand threads like this. I really can't help but think no one plays monks in your guy's campaigns, so you've never really seen high level monks in action. Whereas I see them in action almost every campaign. They are always a huge pain in my behind as a fourth character. Far moreso than any rogue could ever hope to be. And the only thing we don't do that other groups do is use 15 point point buy. So MAD isn't a factor. When you're not dealing with MAD, monks are very fun and potent to play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why Did The Game Wimp Out On Monks?
Top