Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Galloglaich" data-source="post: 4614511" data-attributes="member: 77019">3.5 is kind of swollen and I agree it's not fun to DM at high levels, but I never liked playing really high-levels anyway.&nbsp; In fact my main beef with 3.5 was that it seemed to shove all square, triangular etc. pegs into the same round hole of high-magic / high - level play.&nbsp;&nbsp; So I did think it was ready for a significant reform, but from everything I read about 4E it seemed like they were taking it in almost exactly the wrong direction (with the single exception of overall simplification which is a good idea) I expected 4E was going to be a catastrophe, without even the saving grace of the D20 / OGL escape valve.From this thread it sounds like 4E is everything I expected and more.&nbsp; G.EDIT: I agree with a lot of other posters that Warhammer FRPG looks a lot more like the kind of game I prefer over 4E, I wish DnD had gone more in that direction...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Galloglaich, post: 4614511, member: 77019"] 3.5 is kind of swollen and I agree it's not fun to DM at high levels, but I never liked playing really high-levels anyway. In fact my main beef with 3.5 was that it seemed to shove all square, triangular etc. pegs into the same round hole of high-magic / high - level play. So I did think it was ready for a significant reform, but from everything I read about 4E it seemed like they were taking it in almost exactly the wrong direction (with the single exception of overall simplification which is a good idea) I expected 4E was going to be a catastrophe, without even the saving grace of the D20 / OGL escape valve. From this thread it sounds like 4E is everything I expected and more. G. EDIT: I agree with a lot of other posters that Warhammer FRPG looks a lot more like the kind of game I prefer over 4E, I wish DnD had gone more in that direction... [/QUOTE]

Verification