Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why did you stop subscribing to DDI?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RLBURNSIDE" data-source="post: 5590152" data-attributes="member: 94650"><p><strong>the</strong></p><p></p><p>offline CB is indeed way better in every, but a lot of groups (including mine), have grudgingly switched over to the new one so the players have no choice to use it. Sucky, but there it is. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The rationale of our DM was that he didn't want to hack around with potentially un-errata'ed stuff taken from a pirated feat/power database, or be out of date with new classes and so on, as misguided as that is...I know the patches for new books come out like one or two days later for the pirate version. The offline CB can be patched up at-will by modifying the data yourself. I mean, if that's not superior in every way, I don't know what is.</p><p></p><p>Buying, equipping items is TERRIBLE in the new builder, but apparently they are revamping that section (thank Crom for that).</p><p></p><p>I just hope they don't errata my character before we retire this campaign, as I have no intention of playing another 4e game after this. It'll be either 5e, or Pathfinder all the time (I play PF as well, and it's more fun, frankly). I do like 4e optimization better though, because it's like a math puzzle. PF just works, is both simpler and more powerful, with creative use of spells in and out of combat. At level 6 we saved an entire Drow civilization from a Lucodemon invasion, travelled to another world, flew around, managed armies, ...you can't even do 1/2 the things we did until epic in 4e, if that.</p><p></p><p>Point is, they can keep improving the builder more and more, but the game itself is inherently on rails, and the system affects roleplaying negatively as well. The builder is just a steaming pile of crap, ala South Park's latest episode...They start hinting a good things, then all I read is poo, poo poo flung at my eyes from the page of downloaded material.</p><p></p><p>E.g. they came out with hybrid cavaliers with no option for a mount. WTF? This is garbage. Stop forcing us to play one-trick pony characters, it drives us more to PF (well, not the melee classes, which are probably more one-trick than 4e guys are...except the overall feel of the game is more dangerous, epic, and memorable as a result)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RLBURNSIDE, post: 5590152, member: 94650"] [b]the[/b] offline CB is indeed way better in every, but a lot of groups (including mine), have grudgingly switched over to the new one so the players have no choice to use it. Sucky, but there it is. The rationale of our DM was that he didn't want to hack around with potentially un-errata'ed stuff taken from a pirated feat/power database, or be out of date with new classes and so on, as misguided as that is...I know the patches for new books come out like one or two days later for the pirate version. The offline CB can be patched up at-will by modifying the data yourself. I mean, if that's not superior in every way, I don't know what is. Buying, equipping items is TERRIBLE in the new builder, but apparently they are revamping that section (thank Crom for that). I just hope they don't errata my character before we retire this campaign, as I have no intention of playing another 4e game after this. It'll be either 5e, or Pathfinder all the time (I play PF as well, and it's more fun, frankly). I do like 4e optimization better though, because it's like a math puzzle. PF just works, is both simpler and more powerful, with creative use of spells in and out of combat. At level 6 we saved an entire Drow civilization from a Lucodemon invasion, travelled to another world, flew around, managed armies, ...you can't even do 1/2 the things we did until epic in 4e, if that. Point is, they can keep improving the builder more and more, but the game itself is inherently on rails, and the system affects roleplaying negatively as well. The builder is just a steaming pile of crap, ala South Park's latest episode...They start hinting a good things, then all I read is poo, poo poo flung at my eyes from the page of downloaded material. E.g. they came out with hybrid cavaliers with no option for a mount. WTF? This is garbage. Stop forcing us to play one-trick pony characters, it drives us more to PF (well, not the melee classes, which are probably more one-trick than 4e guys are...except the overall feel of the game is more dangerous, epic, and memorable as a result) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why did you stop subscribing to DDI?
Top