Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Werebat" data-source="post: 6931267" data-attributes="member: 40158">&quot;Seems hostile?&quot;&nbsp; Me?I ask because I rolled a gnome alchemist in a PF game that later switched systems to 5E.&nbsp; I retooled my gnome into an evoker (with the Sage background and Alchemist specialty -- for fluff, really, though we were calling him an &quot;alchemist&quot; and I described him as &quot;throwing bombs&quot; instead of casting fireballs, etc).&nbsp; I played Bizburn the evoker through a few levels before the 5E Alchemist class popped up on ENsider.I was excited at first, then read it and thought it was crap compared to the plain old evoker.I saw the errata, and thought, &quot;Oh Lord, it WAS bad -- so bad it got errata within a month or two of publication!&quot;&nbsp; But even with the errata the class just looked pretty weaksauce compared to the evoker wizard.I was just wondering if I was missing something.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Werebat, post: 6931267, member: 40158"] "Seems hostile?" Me? I ask because I rolled a gnome alchemist in a PF game that later switched systems to 5E. I retooled my gnome into an evoker (with the Sage background and Alchemist specialty -- for fluff, really, though we were calling him an "alchemist" and I described him as "throwing bombs" instead of casting fireballs, etc). I played Bizburn the evoker through a few levels before the 5E Alchemist class popped up on ENsider. I was excited at first, then read it and thought it was crap compared to the plain old evoker. I saw the errata, and thought, "Oh Lord, it WAS bad -- so bad it got errata within a month or two of publication!" But even with the errata the class just looked pretty weaksauce compared to the evoker wizard. I was just wondering if I was missing something. [/QUOTE]

Verification