Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why do all classes have to be balanced?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JamesonCourage" data-source="post: 5908292" data-attributes="member: 6668292"><p>I think your implied context was clear enough to me, which is why I said this (and quoted it again already once):It may have been more as you've described in the past with D&D. It doesn't need to stay that way for 5e. And I think my point is much more important to the overall discussion of 5e than trying to bicker about how past editions work, which I'm hoping to avoid.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That's a good question. [MENTION=6689033]Steely_Dan[/MENTION] has a chunk of it, in that as you go up, you have higher damage output, better feats, etc. As there are prerequisites for some feats, this plays in. But, hit die plays an important part in just exactly <em>what</em> abilities you can have. Most abilities are capped at hit die +1. Base attack, defense bonus, skill ranks, trait ranks, base save, etc. are all capped at your hit die +1. So, a level 15 can have +16 base attack, while a level 3 can only have +4. Things like spell levels available to you are capped by hit die, too. Level makes a big difference in that regard.</p><p></p><p>By hit die 15, I can have a character with a much higher bonus to things than a hit die 3. I have a lot more breadth in abilities, if that's what I wanted, too. But, a hit die 3 could still be built in such a way that he could mechanically contribute to a party of hit die 15s, if he picks up skills that they've neglected.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, I thought from our past discussions about threats against high hit die creatures that it'd be clear that they don't die to the same threats (if they're built for combat). Last Wednesday, the party (four hit die 15s, with one hit die 14) was surprised attacked by a few dozen men. They reacted fast enough (even though surprised) that they were able to teleport a few hundred feet out of the enemies encircling them, and while a couple dozen arrows flew in, only one NPC dropped and one party member hit 0 hit points. They then teleported away altogether. A hit die 3 party wouldn't been cut down. There may have been a survivor or two for <em>possibly</em> up to three rounds depending on build, but it's very unlikely.</p><p></p><p>While the hit die 15s had to retreat from the (originally six dozen, but by the second round eight dozen) enemies, they were able to escape, plan an ambush themselves, and get the job done that they needed to. A party of hit die 3's would stand little to no chance of succeeding in that same tactic. They might be able to talk them into a trade, but they'd need to be really good at it and roll high (which <em>is</em> possible, but very unlikely without a very devoted build).</p><p></p><p>So, yes, you can continue to move the threat level up just fine in the system. I wasn't commenting on that when I said how someone can contribute. I mentioned skills. Now, someone <em>could</em> mechanically contribute in combat (giving someone a +6 to a combat roll) at hit die 1, but they'd need to be very, very focused on it, and they're risking making themselves a target, and they're lacking hit die 15 saves, AC, and hit points. But as far as skills go? They can definitely drive the game forward, and a hit die 1 can definitely contribute with them if the PCs are lacking them. And, really, that's why I listed skill uses, and mentioned that it'd be <em>harder</em> to contribute in combat.</p><p></p><p>That's just what I'm trying to say. In 5e, you can make a game where a level 1 <em>can</em> consistently meaningfully contribute to a level 15 party. It may not be in combat as well, but you can certainly design a system that helps with it. This is <em>especially</em> true in a system that has even flatter math than mine (which caps at about +19 natural bonus to attack rolls at hit die 20, with incredible focus on attacking). So, again, I'm commenting about game theory and how this could end up in 5e. I have little interest in arguing over how badly D&D has done this historically. As always, play what you like <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JamesonCourage, post: 5908292, member: 6668292"] I think your implied context was clear enough to me, which is why I said this (and quoted it again already once):It may have been more as you've described in the past with D&D. It doesn't need to stay that way for 5e. And I think my point is much more important to the overall discussion of 5e than trying to bicker about how past editions work, which I'm hoping to avoid. That's a good question. [MENTION=6689033]Steely_Dan[/MENTION] has a chunk of it, in that as you go up, you have higher damage output, better feats, etc. As there are prerequisites for some feats, this plays in. But, hit die plays an important part in just exactly [I]what[/I] abilities you can have. Most abilities are capped at hit die +1. Base attack, defense bonus, skill ranks, trait ranks, base save, etc. are all capped at your hit die +1. So, a level 15 can have +16 base attack, while a level 3 can only have +4. Things like spell levels available to you are capped by hit die, too. Level makes a big difference in that regard. By hit die 15, I can have a character with a much higher bonus to things than a hit die 3. I have a lot more breadth in abilities, if that's what I wanted, too. But, a hit die 3 could still be built in such a way that he could mechanically contribute to a party of hit die 15s, if he picks up skills that they've neglected. Well, I thought from our past discussions about threats against high hit die creatures that it'd be clear that they don't die to the same threats (if they're built for combat). Last Wednesday, the party (four hit die 15s, with one hit die 14) was surprised attacked by a few dozen men. They reacted fast enough (even though surprised) that they were able to teleport a few hundred feet out of the enemies encircling them, and while a couple dozen arrows flew in, only one NPC dropped and one party member hit 0 hit points. They then teleported away altogether. A hit die 3 party wouldn't been cut down. There may have been a survivor or two for [I]possibly[/I] up to three rounds depending on build, but it's very unlikely. While the hit die 15s had to retreat from the (originally six dozen, but by the second round eight dozen) enemies, they were able to escape, plan an ambush themselves, and get the job done that they needed to. A party of hit die 3's would stand little to no chance of succeeding in that same tactic. They might be able to talk them into a trade, but they'd need to be really good at it and roll high (which [I]is[/I] possible, but very unlikely without a very devoted build). So, yes, you can continue to move the threat level up just fine in the system. I wasn't commenting on that when I said how someone can contribute. I mentioned skills. Now, someone [I]could[/I] mechanically contribute in combat (giving someone a +6 to a combat roll) at hit die 1, but they'd need to be very, very focused on it, and they're risking making themselves a target, and they're lacking hit die 15 saves, AC, and hit points. But as far as skills go? They can definitely drive the game forward, and a hit die 1 can definitely contribute with them if the PCs are lacking them. And, really, that's why I listed skill uses, and mentioned that it'd be [I]harder[/I] to contribute in combat. That's just what I'm trying to say. In 5e, you can make a game where a level 1 [I]can[/I] consistently meaningfully contribute to a level 15 party. It may not be in combat as well, but you can certainly design a system that helps with it. This is [I]especially[/I] true in a system that has even flatter math than mine (which caps at about +19 natural bonus to attack rolls at hit die 20, with incredible focus on attacking). So, again, I'm commenting about game theory and how this could end up in 5e. I have little interest in arguing over how badly D&D has done this historically. As always, play what you like :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why do all classes have to be balanced?
Top