Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Why do cricket games take so frickin' LONG?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 3458495" data-attributes="member: 22424"><p>In test match cricket: Each team has two innings, each of which lasts until either all ten wickets have been captured, or until the batting team 'declares'. The game has a five-day time limit, which (broadly speaking) is not extended depending on the weather. To win, you have to score more runs than the opposing team after all four innings have been concluded. If the fifth day ends before the final innings is complete, the game is a draw.</p><p></p><p>Because the innings last an undefined length of time, the game itself will inevitably last a long time.</p><p></p><p>In one-day cricket: Each team has a single innings, capped at 50 overs (300 balls bowled). To win, you must score more runs than the opposing team.</p><p></p><p>In twenty20 cricket: As one-day cricket, except an innings is capped at 20 overs (120 balls bowled).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>One day cricket is entirely different in complexion from test match cricket. In TM cricket, it is quite common for one team to find themselves with no real chance of winning, and the game becomes a battle between the batsmen and the bowlers, with the batsmen not trying to score runs to win the game, but rather battling to stay 'in', to run down the clock.</p><p></p><p>Additionally, a cricket team will typically be made up of players with different skills: you have your top batsmen and your top bowlers. In test match cricket, everyone has to bat, and that requires a bit of caution from the top batsmen - they can't go wild in case they get put out cheaply, and the team suffers. But, with one-day cricket, it is likely that only a few people will have to bat, which means the top batsmen can be a bit more adventurous. If they lose their wicket cheaply it doesn't really matter - the next guy is probably a top batsman too.</p><p></p><p>All of the considerations with one-day cricket also apply to twenty20 cricket, but to an even greater extent.</p><p></p><p>There's probably more to it than that, but I'm not an expert on the subject. Both my father and grandfather have followed cricket for years, though, and are rather dismissive of the one-day and twenty20 forms - they like the longer strategic battles of the test match version of the game. To them, the length is a feature, not a bug.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delericho, post: 3458495, member: 22424"] In test match cricket: Each team has two innings, each of which lasts until either all ten wickets have been captured, or until the batting team 'declares'. The game has a five-day time limit, which (broadly speaking) is not extended depending on the weather. To win, you have to score more runs than the opposing team after all four innings have been concluded. If the fifth day ends before the final innings is complete, the game is a draw. Because the innings last an undefined length of time, the game itself will inevitably last a long time. In one-day cricket: Each team has a single innings, capped at 50 overs (300 balls bowled). To win, you must score more runs than the opposing team. In twenty20 cricket: As one-day cricket, except an innings is capped at 20 overs (120 balls bowled). One day cricket is entirely different in complexion from test match cricket. In TM cricket, it is quite common for one team to find themselves with no real chance of winning, and the game becomes a battle between the batsmen and the bowlers, with the batsmen not trying to score runs to win the game, but rather battling to stay 'in', to run down the clock. Additionally, a cricket team will typically be made up of players with different skills: you have your top batsmen and your top bowlers. In test match cricket, everyone has to bat, and that requires a bit of caution from the top batsmen - they can't go wild in case they get put out cheaply, and the team suffers. But, with one-day cricket, it is likely that only a few people will have to bat, which means the top batsmen can be a bit more adventurous. If they lose their wicket cheaply it doesn't really matter - the next guy is probably a top batsman too. All of the considerations with one-day cricket also apply to twenty20 cricket, but to an even greater extent. There's probably more to it than that, but I'm not an expert on the subject. Both my father and grandfather have followed cricket for years, though, and are rather dismissive of the one-day and twenty20 forms - they like the longer strategic battles of the test match version of the game. To them, the length is a feature, not a bug. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Why do cricket games take so frickin' LONG?
Top