Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why do DMs have a rule regarding how much can be spent on one item?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 3007493" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>This is all dependent on the campaign and the players.</p><p></p><p>First, the half sell price limitation can easily be avoided. I do not know of any games where every 11th level PC has exactly 66K and every 12th level PC has exactly 88K, etc. PCs have a variety of items, some bought, some made, some found. Since this varies greatly from campaign to campaign, it should also vary from PC to PC.</p><p></p><p>In fact, a DM forcing all PCs to have nearly the exact same wealth would result in a pretty skewed situation. This can only be enforced by a combination of the DM and the players. Recently, I added up the wealth of the PCs in our group and one PC had more than twice what anyone else had. The players in my group do not know it and most of them did not care: although we did start a new system for those who did care of the DM keeping track of wealth in certain categories and the PC who is lowest on the totem pole gets to pick first for newly found items. But before this change, their idea was to give items to whomever could use them the most effectively. Other players (or PCs) in a different game might be very detailed and party wealth balanced oriented.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As to the original question, really, who cares? If an 11th level PC wants a +5 Greatsword and has very few other items, what's the problem. He is a very offensive combatant type who can only last a few rounds. Err, so?</p><p></p><p>As a DM, I do not impose an artificial rule that a PC cannot have an item worth more than xyz, instead, I just place items based on current challenges. Sometimes, that means a very expensive item if the challenge is very great and it makes sense for the NPC to have the item. If they overcome the challenge, the players then decide whether they want one PC to have that item, or whether they want to sell it so that all of the PCs can benefit from it.</p><p></p><p>Course, we start campaigns from level one, so I could see if a DM started the campaign out at much higher level, he would have such a house rule.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 3007493, member: 2011"] This is all dependent on the campaign and the players. First, the half sell price limitation can easily be avoided. I do not know of any games where every 11th level PC has exactly 66K and every 12th level PC has exactly 88K, etc. PCs have a variety of items, some bought, some made, some found. Since this varies greatly from campaign to campaign, it should also vary from PC to PC. In fact, a DM forcing all PCs to have nearly the exact same wealth would result in a pretty skewed situation. This can only be enforced by a combination of the DM and the players. Recently, I added up the wealth of the PCs in our group and one PC had more than twice what anyone else had. The players in my group do not know it and most of them did not care: although we did start a new system for those who did care of the DM keeping track of wealth in certain categories and the PC who is lowest on the totem pole gets to pick first for newly found items. But before this change, their idea was to give items to whomever could use them the most effectively. Other players (or PCs) in a different game might be very detailed and party wealth balanced oriented. As to the original question, really, who cares? If an 11th level PC wants a +5 Greatsword and has very few other items, what's the problem. He is a very offensive combatant type who can only last a few rounds. Err, so? As a DM, I do not impose an artificial rule that a PC cannot have an item worth more than xyz, instead, I just place items based on current challenges. Sometimes, that means a very expensive item if the challenge is very great and it makes sense for the NPC to have the item. If they overcome the challenge, the players then decide whether they want one PC to have that item, or whether they want to sell it so that all of the PCs can benefit from it. Course, we start campaigns from level one, so I could see if a DM started the campaign out at much higher level, he would have such a house rule. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why do DMs have a rule regarding how much can be spent on one item?
Top