Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why do guns do so much damage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steampunkette" data-source="post: 8296091" data-attributes="member: 6796468"><p>Which is why it's -so- good during many of the medieval wars before the primacy of firearms.</p><p></p><p>People used Bows of various kinds to hunt, to fish, to compete in fairs and tournaments, and to show off! So having an army's ranged units centered around archer was super effective. And if that had been the state of America during the War? WHOO DOGGY would it have been -hyper- effective at ending the war with a quickness!</p><p></p><p>But. For the better part of two centuries, the musket and pistol had usurped the place of the bow in the hands of the common man. Just an afternoon of training was enough to send your eldest son into the forest to come back with a few rabbits or a deer, after all. So much easier than learning how to use a bow!</p><p></p><p>Had the continental army tried to use archery they'd have been at some disadvantage. Enough of one to lose the war? <em>shrugs</em> No one alive can say. Maybe the army would've gotten "Enough" accuracy pretty quickly to be useful in killing the redcoats as they stood in their nice neat rows and the archers hid behind trees, rocks, and other objects while spread apart to limit the utility of volley fire. The fire rate certainly would have been nice.</p><p></p><p>But then there's the -cost-. Making lead balls and gunpowder had gotten fairly "Easy" by this point. But actually making arrows remained (and still remains) a time consuming process. Not just for the arrowheads, but for the shaft and fletching themselves, which took a goodly bit of expertise and delicacy to manage.</p><p></p><p>While fielding -some- soldiers with Longbows might have increased the efficacy of the Revolutionary Army simply through continuous fire, the amount of effort involved in maintaining such a military diversification would've been fairly high.</p><p></p><p>Very -VERY- True. Every word.</p><p></p><p>Though... in retrospect. Recurve Bows and Composite Bows would have been a different direction to go. Get within 30ish yards of the Red Coats while they're reloading and start loosing arrows from a Recurve Bow with a 25-35 pound draw weight?</p><p></p><p>Could've been useful, at least. Still expensive for the arrows if nothing else!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steampunkette, post: 8296091, member: 6796468"] Which is why it's -so- good during many of the medieval wars before the primacy of firearms. People used Bows of various kinds to hunt, to fish, to compete in fairs and tournaments, and to show off! So having an army's ranged units centered around archer was super effective. And if that had been the state of America during the War? WHOO DOGGY would it have been -hyper- effective at ending the war with a quickness! But. For the better part of two centuries, the musket and pistol had usurped the place of the bow in the hands of the common man. Just an afternoon of training was enough to send your eldest son into the forest to come back with a few rabbits or a deer, after all. So much easier than learning how to use a bow! Had the continental army tried to use archery they'd have been at some disadvantage. Enough of one to lose the war? [I]shrugs[/I] No one alive can say. Maybe the army would've gotten "Enough" accuracy pretty quickly to be useful in killing the redcoats as they stood in their nice neat rows and the archers hid behind trees, rocks, and other objects while spread apart to limit the utility of volley fire. The fire rate certainly would have been nice. But then there's the -cost-. Making lead balls and gunpowder had gotten fairly "Easy" by this point. But actually making arrows remained (and still remains) a time consuming process. Not just for the arrowheads, but for the shaft and fletching themselves, which took a goodly bit of expertise and delicacy to manage. While fielding -some- soldiers with Longbows might have increased the efficacy of the Revolutionary Army simply through continuous fire, the amount of effort involved in maintaining such a military diversification would've been fairly high. Very -VERY- True. Every word. Though... in retrospect. Recurve Bows and Composite Bows would have been a different direction to go. Get within 30ish yards of the Red Coats while they're reloading and start loosing arrows from a Recurve Bow with a 25-35 pound draw weight? Could've been useful, at least. Still expensive for the arrows if nothing else! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why do guns do so much damage?
Top